Use of Artificial Neuron Network to Predict Dental Arch Form

Johan Arief Budiman


Objective: To develop diagnostic reference for arch form using Artificial Neuron Network (ANN) from tooth size and arch dimension variables on scanned-dental cast from patients with class I malocclusion treated orthodontically. Material and Methods: One hundred and ninety pairs of dental cast pre-post orthodontic treatment gathered from Orthodontic clinics were scanned and then all dimension variables were measured using Image Tool (gender, tooth size and arch dimension). The multivariate data were analyzed statistically using Stata (Lakeway Drive, College Station, Texas USA). The statistic results were compiled to build the neuron network software for analyzing arch form. Results: Gender and all variables from pre-treatment do not influence arch form. Intercanine width, canine depth, intermolar width, and molar depth are variables that influence arch form. The result of the statistical analyses can be used to develop software based on artificial neural network. Output program is the arch form, such as oval, square or tapered. The software can describe arch form with the accuracy of 76.31%. Conclusion: A software using Artificial Neuron Network to describe arch form can be used for diagnostic reference to Class I malocclusion.


Dental Arch; Tooth; Malocclusion; Neural Networks

Full Text:



Black GV. Descriptive Anatomy of Human Teeth. Philadelphia: Wilmington Dental Manufacturing Co., 1902.

Wheeler RC. A Textbook of Dental Anatomy and Physiology. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders Co., 1961.

Bailit HL. Dental Variation among populations: An anthropologic view. Dent Clin North Am 1975; 19(1):125-39.

Bishara SE, Garcia AF, Jacobsen JR, Fahl JA. Mesiodistal crown dimensions in Mexico and the United States. Angle Orthod 1986; 56(4):315-23.

Keene HJ. Mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth in male American negroes. Am J Orthod 1979; 76(1):95-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(79)90303-8.

Lavelle CLB. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Orthod 1972; 61(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(72)90173-X.

Proffit WR, Fields HJ (eds). Contemporary Orthodontics. ed. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, 1986.

Graber TM. Orthodontics - Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1966.

Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder J, Nowak A. Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 111(4):401-9. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80022-4.

Ranly DM, A Synopsis of Craniofacial Growth, Prentice-Hall International, Inc. 1988. p. 32-123.

Zilberman O, Huggare JAV, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003; 73(3):301-6.

Hayasaki H, Martins RP, Gandini Jr LG, Saitoh I, Nonaka K. A new way of analyzing occlusion 3 dimensionally. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128(1):128-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.039.

Wilcox D, Dove SB, McDavid WD, Greer DB. Overview UTHSCSA image tool: Help on-line. San Antonio, Texas, 1995-2002.

Taner TU, Ciger S, El H, GermeƧ D, Es A. Evaluation of dental arch width and form changes after orthodontic treatment and retention with a new computerized method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126(4):464-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.08.033.

Sondhi A, Cleall JF, BeGole EA. Dimensional changes in the dental arches of orthodontically treated cases. Am J Orthod 1980; 77(1):60-74. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90224-9.

Paredes V, Gandia JL, Cibrian R. New, fast, and accurate procedure to calibrate a 2-dimensional digital measurement method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127(4):518-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.025.

Budiman JA. Comparing methods for dental casts measurement. Asian J Applied Sci 2016; 4(2):303-8.