Economic Burden of Selected Diagnostic Imaging Methods in Oral Cancer

Martin Samohyl, Pavol Beno, Katarina Hirosova, Lubica Argalasova, Jana Jurkovicova

Abstract


Objective: To analyse of proportion and economic burden of selected diagnostic imaging methods of oral cancer according to quarters and average percentage differences in the Slovak population in the period 2016-2017. Material and Methods: In this descriptive study, the data were retrieved from the information system of the largest public health insurance company on our request, which archives the cost and proportion of diagnostic imaging methods of oral cancer in Slovak population. It was evaluated 48,995 of selected diagnostic imaging methods (Computed Tomography [CT], Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MRI] and X-Ray) in the period 2016-2017. Results: The most frequently used diagnostic imaging method of oral cancer was magnetic resonance imaging method every quarters in 2016 and 2017 (53.7-54.7%) with slightly increasing trend in period 2016-2017. Mean economic burden of selected diagnostic imaging methods of oral cancer were 1,974,900€ for MRI method, 598,187€ for CT method and 5,394€ for RTG method in 2017. Decreasing trend of economic burden of diagnostic imaging method was found in MRI method and CT method in period 2016-2017. Conclusion: Our economic burden study provides a useful source for public health professional and clinicians in better understanding the economic burden of diagnostic methods in oral cancer.


Keywords


Diagnostic Imaging; Mouth Neoplasms; Cost of Illnes.

Full Text:

PDF

References


GLOBOCAN: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. Lyon: IARC, 2013. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_ population.aspx. [Accessed 20 January 2018].

Ghantous Y, Abu Elnaaj I. Global incidence and risk factors of oral cancer. Harefuah 2017; 156(10):645-9.

Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 2009; 45(4-5):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.06.002.

Ribeiro DA. Cytogenetic biomonitoring in oral mucosa cells following dental X-ray. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41(3):181-4. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/14555883.

Pałasz P, Adamski Ł, Górska-Chrząstek M, Starzyńska A, Studniarek M. Contemporary diagnostic imaging of oral squamous cell carcinoma - A review of literature. Pol J Radiol 2017; 82:193-202. doi: 10.12659/PJR.900892.

de Sousa RIM, de Sousa RTA, Godoy GP, Cavalcanti AL, Nonaka CFW, Alves PM. Knowledge of Brazilian Dentists about Oral Cancer. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr 2016; 16(1):177-84. doi: 10.4034/PBOCI.2016.161.19.

de Almeida Carrer FC, Cossato EM, Cazal C, Júnior GAP, de Silva DP, de Araújo ME. Oral cancer screening in elderly in Sao Paulo State, Brazil (2001 to 2009). Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr 2017; 17(1):e2831. doi: 10.4034/PBOCI.2017. 171.34.

Hanna LMO, Botti MTSR, Araújo RJG, Damasceno JM, Mayhew ASB, de Andrade Filho GG. Oral manifestations and salivary ph changes in children undergoing antineoplastic therapy. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr 2016; 16(1):403-410. doi: 10.4034/PBOCI.2016.161.42.

Han S, Chen Y, Ge X, Zhang M, Wang J, Zhao Q, He J, et al. Epidemiology and cost analysis for patients with oral cancer in a university hospital in China. BMC Public Health 2010; 10:196. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-19610.

de Lacerda Vidal AK, de Araújo Aguiar DM, da Cruz Gouveia MV, Neto PMC, da Silva Tavares AN, de Guimaraens MA. Verificação do conhecimento da população pernambucana acerca do câncer de boca e dos fatores de risco – Brasil. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr 2012; 12(3):383-7. doi: 10.4034/PBOCI.2012.123.13

Khodaparast M, Lotfi MH, Hashemipour MA. Knowledge and attitude of Iranian dental and medical students towards oral precancerous lesions. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr 2018; 18(1):e3861. doi: 10.4034/PBOCI.2018.181.24.

de Lemos Almeida MMR, da Rosa MRD, Alves PM, da Paz AR, de Almeida Rodrigues MI, Jatobá CAN. changes in the immuno-expression of galectins -1, -3 and -7 in relation to the biological behavior of lip squamous cell carcinoma. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr 2017; 17(1):e2759. doi: 10.4034/PBOCI.2017. 171.09.

Figueiredo PT, Leite AF, Freitas AC, Nascimento LA, Cavalcanti MG, Melo NS, Guerra EN. Comparison between computed tomography and clinical evaluation in tumour/node stage and follow-up of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39(3):140-148. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/69910245.

Moreira MA, Lessa LS, Bortoli FR, Lopes A, Xavier EP, Ceretta RA, Sônego FGF, et al. Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging accuracy for diagnosis of oral cancer. PLoS One 2017; 12(5):e0177462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177462.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2018.181.94

PBOCI IS A MEMBER OF CROSSREF AND ALL THE CONTENT OF ITS JOURNALS ARE LINKED BY DOIS THROUGH CROSSREF.