Agreement Between Working Length Measurements in Primary Teeth Obtained by Radiographs or Apical Locators

Ingrid Caroline Silva  Brum; Caroline Andrade  Maia; Marlon Vinícius Tramujas  Diniz; Alexandre Moreira  Fernandes; Maria Luiza da Matta Felisberto  Fernandes

Authors

Ingrid Caroline Silva Brum
Caroline Andrade Maia
Marlon Vinícius Tramujas Diniz
Alexandre Moreira Fernandes
Maria Luiza da Matta Felisberto Fernandes

Keywords:

Pediatric Dentistry, Tooth, Deciduous, Endodontics, Radiography, Dental

Abstract

Objective: To perform an in vivo evaluation on the agreement between measurements of working length obtained by conventional radiographic examinations and an apex locator in deciduous teeth with or without root resorption. Material and Methods: Nine canals of teeth from children ranging from 3 to 5 years old were selected. Endodontic access was performed with a spherical diamond tip, the pulp was removed with Kerr-type steel files, and the canal was irrigated with 1% sodium hypochlorite. A file, compatible with the channel gauge, was then used to measure the length of the root canal with the apex locator. Conventional radiographs were also performed and, using a millimeter endodontic ruler, the length of the canal was determined. The differences between the measurements obtained between the two methods were analyzed using the Student's t-test. Results: The mean canal length for conventional radiography was 9.83 mm and 9.67 mm for the apex locator. The results of this study did not show significant differences (p=0.641), independent of the presence or absence of physiological root resorption. Conclusion: The similarity in measurements obtained with X-ray or an apex locator indicates that it is not necessary to use X-rays as a complement to obtain the working length. The use of the apex locator can provide a quicker treatment, reducing the clinical time and stress of the child.

References

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Pediatric Dent 2008; 30(7):170-74.

Guedes Pinto AC, Santos, EM. Tratamento endodôntico em dentes decíduos. In: Guedes Pinto AC. Odontopediatria. 8th. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2010. p. 589-612. [In Portuguese].

Mello-Moura ACV, Borelli T, Matos R, Bonini GC, Moura-Netto C. How can we optimize endodontics in primary teeth? a reported case. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 2012; 67(1):50-5.

Goerig AC, Camp JH. Root canal treatment in primary teeth: a review. Pediatric Dent 1983; 5(1):33-7.

Assed S, Freitas AC, Silva LA, Nelson-Filho P. Tratamento endodôntico em dentes decíduos. In: Leonardo M.R. Endodontia: tratamento de canais radiculares princípios técnicos e biológicos. 4th. ed. São Paulo: Artes Médicas. 2005; p. 167-232. [In Portuguese].

Nelson-Filho P, Romualdo PC, Bonifácio KC, Leonardo MR, Silva RA, Silva LA. Accuracy of the iPex multi- frequency electronicapex locator in primary molars: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2011; 44(4):303-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01827.x

Silva EJ, Herrera DR, Souza-Junior EJ, Rosa TP. Evaluation of the multifrequency electronic apex locator Joyapex 5 in primary teeth. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2014; 15(1):51-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0065-0

Mello-Moura AC, Moura-Netto C, Araki AT, Guedes-Pinto AC, Mendes FM. Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in primary anterior teeth. Int Endod J 2010; 43(2):143-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01667.x

Mente J, Seidel J, Buchalla W, Koch MJ. Electronic determination of root canal length in primary teeth with and without root resorption. Int Endod J 2002; 35(5):447-52.

Angwaravong O, Panitvisai P. Accuracy of an eletronic apex locator in primary teeth with root resorption. Int Endod J 2009; 42(1):115-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01476.x

Beltrame AP, Triches TC, Sartori N, Bolan M.Electronic determination of root canal working length in primary molar teeth: an in vivo and ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2010; 44(3):402-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01839.x

Saraf PA, Ratnakar P, Patil TN, Penukonda R, Kamatagi L, Vanaki SS. A comparative clinical evaluation of accuracy of six apex locators with intraoral periapical radiograph in multirooted teeth: An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent 2017; 20:264-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_131_17

Katz A, Tamse A, Kaufman AY. Tooth length determination: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 72(2):238-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(91)90169-D

Subramaniam P, Konde S, Mandanna DK. An in vitro comparison of root canal measurement in primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2005; 23(3):124-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.16883

Plotino G, Grande NM, Brigante L, Lesti B, Somma F. Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: root ZX, elements diagnostic unit and apex locator and ProPex. Int Endod J 2006; 39(5):408-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01095.x

Tosun G, Erdemir A, Eldeniz AU, Sermet U, Sener Y. Accuracy of two electronic apex locators in primary teeth with and without apical resorption: a laboratory study. Int Endod J 2008; 41(5):436-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01389.x

Kielbassa AM, Muller U, Munz I, Monting JS. Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of ROOT ZX in primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95(1):94-100. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.99

Leonardo MR, Silva LAB, Nelson-Filho P, Silva RAB, Raffaini MSGG. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth. Int Endod J 2008; 41(3):317-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01366.x

Katz A, Mass E, Kaufman AY. Electronic apex locator: a useful tool for root canal treatment in the primary dentition. J Dent Child 1996; 63(6):414-7.

Sunada I. New method for measuring the length of the root canal. J Dent Res 1962; 41(2):375-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345620410020801

Guimarães BM, Marciano MA, Amoroso-Silva PA ,Alcalde MP, Bramante, Duarte MAH. The use of apex locator in endodontics: a literature review. ROBRAC 2014; 23(64):112-5.

Dunlap CA, Remeikis NA, BeGole EA, Rauschenberger CR. An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio method in vital and necrotic canals. J Endod 1998; 24(1):48-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80214-8

Elayouti A, Weiger R, Lost C. The ability of root ZX apex locator to reduce the frequency of overestimated radiographic working length. J Endod 2002; 28(2):116-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200202000-00017

Frank AL, Torabinejad M. An in vivo evaluation of Endex electronic apex locator. J Endod 1993; 19(4):177-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80683-7

Fouad AF, Krell KV, McKendry DJ, Koorbusch GF, Olson RA. Clinical evaluation of five electronic root canal length measuring instruments. J Endod 1990; 16(9):446-9.

Bertoli FMP, Bruzamolin CD, Baratto Filho F, Silva DA, Tomazinho FFS, Gonzaga CC, et al. Performance in vitro of apex locators in determining root length in primary molars. RGO 2016; 64(3):244-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720160003000013230

Bodur H, Odabas M, Tulunoglu O, Tinaz AC. Accuracy of two different apex locators in primary teeth with and without root resorption. Clin Oral Investig 2008; 12(2):137-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0157-5

Ghaemmaghami S, Eberle J, Duperon D. Evaluation of the Root ZX apex locator in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2008; 30(6):496-8.

Haffner C, Folwaczny M, Galler K, Hickel R. Accuracy of electronic apex locators in comparison to actual length: an in vivo study. J Dent 2004; 33(8):619-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.017

Wu MK, Wesselink PR, Walton RE. Apical terminus location of root canal treatment procedures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89(1):99-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(00)80023-2

European Society of Endodontology. Consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology on quality guidelines for endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 1994; 27(12):115-24.

Khandewal D, Ballal NV, Saraswathi MV. Comparative evaluation of accuracy of 2 electronic apex locators with conventional radiography: An ex vivo study. J Endod 2015; 41(2):201-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.011

Lozano A, Forner L, Llena C. In vitro comparison of root-canal measurements with conventional and digital radiography. Int Endod J 2002; 35(6):542-50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00535.x

Brunton PA, Abdeen D, MacFarlane TV. The effect of an apex locator on exposure to radiation during endodontic therapy. J Endod 2002; 28(7):524-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200207000-00009

Demiriz L, Kocak MM, Saglam BC, Kocak S. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of ProPex II, Raypex 6 and iPex II electronic apex locators in primary molar teeth. J Health Res Rev 2016; 3(2):37-40. https://doi.org/10.4103/2394-2010.184227

Bahrololoomi Z, Soleymani AA, Modaresi J, Imanian M, Lotfian M. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator for working length determination in primary anterior teeth. J Dent 2015; 12(4):243-8.

Fouad AF, Rivera EM, Krell KV. Accuracy of the Endex with variations in canal irrigants and foramen size. J Endod 1993; 19(2):63-7.

Abdullah A, Singh N, Rathore MS, Tandon S, Rajkumar B. Comparative evaluation of electronic apex locators and radiovisiography for working length determination in primary teeth in vivo. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016; 9(2):118- 23. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1346

Bhat KV, Shetty P, Anandakrishna L. A comparative evaluation of accuracy of new-generation electronic apex locator with conventional radiography to determine working length in primary teeth: an in vivo study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017; 10(1):34-36. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1403