Use of Mini-Implant Anchorage For Second Molar Mesialization: Comprehensive Approach For Treatment Efficiency Analysis

Oleh  Rivis; Anatoliy  Potapchuk; Myroslav  Goncharuk-Khomyn; Anatoliy  Bokoch

Authors

Oleh Rivis
Anatoliy Potapchuk
Myroslav Goncharuk-Khomyn
Anatoliy Bokoch

Keywords:

Dental Implants, Molar, Mesial Movement of Teeth, Radiography, Dental, Digital

Abstract

Objective: To approbate the complex approach for assessment of second molar mesialization outcomes with the use of orthodontic mini-implants. Material and Methods: The sample consisted of 62 patients, divided into study (n=32) and control group (n=30). Mesialization procedure in the study group was conducted with the use of braces system and orthodontic mini-implants as additional anchorage devices, while in control group mesialization was provided only with the use of the brace system. Dynamic registration of bone level changes and the entire range of tooth movement were carried out on digital orthopantomograms obtained with the use of Planmeca ProMax 2D. Results: Findings of orthopantomographic (OPG) analysis have shown that cases of second molar mesialization with the use of mini-implants as temporary anchorage characterized with more stable conditions of bone levels around displaced teeth compare to cases, where mesialization was provided only with the use of braces systems without any additional anchorage. The terms of treatment in the study group with the use of dental mini-implants as the anchorage was reduced by 8.8 ± 0.12 months compared to the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: The use of orthodontic mini- implants as anchorage constructions during the mesialization of the mandibular second molars contributes to the reduction of treatment duration and support the more prognostic movement of teeth, that does not provoke significant pathological changes in the levels of the surrounded alveolar ridge and minimize the risk of associated periodontal complication occurrence.

References

Samruajbenjakun B, Samansukumal S, Charoemratrote C, Leepong, N, Leethanakul C. Effects on alveolar bone changes following corticotomy-assisted molar mesialization. J Indian Orthod Soc 2018; 52(5):49-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974909820180508S

Mehta S, Lodha S. Mandibular molar mesialization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 152(3):292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.014

Arsenina OI, Kozachenko VE, Nadtochiy AG, Fomin MY, Popova NV. The mesialization of molars of the lower jaw after performance surgical manipulation with using miniscrew anchorage approach. Stomatologiia 2018; 97(4):37-41. https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20189704137

Jacobs C, Jacobs-Müller C, Luley C, Erbe C, Wehrbein H. Orthodontic space closure after first molar extraction without skeletal anchorage. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2011; 72(1):51-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-010-0007-y

Cornelis M, Nyssen-Behets C. Success rates, risk factors and complications of miniplates used for orthodontic anchorage. In: Papadopoulos MA. Skeletal Anchorage in Orthodontic Treatment of Class II Malocclusion: Contemporary Applications of Orthodontic Implants, Miniscrew Implants and Mini Plates. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014. pp. 252-257.

Klang E, Beyling F, Knösel M, Wiechmann D. Quality of occlusal outcome following space closure in cases of lower second premolar aplasia using lingual orthodontic molar mesialization without maxillary counterbalancing extraction. Head Face Med 2018; 14(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-018-0176-2

Wilmes B, Willmann J, Stocker B, Drescher D. The Benefit System and its scope in contemporary orthodontic protocols. APOS Trends Orthod 2015; 5(5):174-80. https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-1407.163414

Kuroda S, Tanaka E. Risks and complications of miniscrew anchorage in clinical orthodontics. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2014; 50(4):79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2014.05.001

Winkler J, Göllner N, Göllner P, Pazera P, Gkantidis N. Apical root resorption due to mandibular first molar mesialization: a split-mouth study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 151(4):708-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.005

De Almeida MR, De Almeida RR, Nanda R. Biomechanics of extra-alveolar mini-implant use in the infrazygomatic crest area for asymmetrical correction of class II subdivision malocclusion. APOS Trends Orthod 2018; 8(2):110-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/apos.apos_25_18

Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nanda R. Biomechanics of incisor retraction with mini-implant anchorage. J Orthod 2014; 41(Suppl 1):S15-23. https://doi.org/10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000114

Itsuki Y, Imamura E. Multipurpose orthodontic system using palatal implants for solving extremely complex orthodontic problems. J World Fed Orthod 2017; 6(2):80-9. https://doi.org/.1016/j.ejwf.2017.04.001

Wehrbein H, Göllner P. Miniscrews or palatal implants for skeletal anchorage in the maxilla: comparative aspects for decision making. World J Orthod 2008; 9(1):63-73.

Wehrbein H, Göllner P. Do palatal implants remain positionally stable under orthodontic load? A clinical radiologic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 136(5):695-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.050

Jung BA, Kunkel M, Göllner P, Liechti T, Wehrbein H. Success rate of second-generation palatal implants: preliminary results of a prospective study. Angle Orthod 2009; 79(1):85-90. https://doi.org/10.2319/010708-8.1

Jung BA, Kunkel M, Göllner P, Liechti T, Wagner W, Wehrbein H. Prognostic parameters contributing to palatal implant failures: a long‐term survival analysis of 239 patients. Clin Oral Implan Res 2012; 23(6):746-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02197.x

Holberg C, Winterhalder P, Holberg N, Wichelhaus A, Rudzki-Janson I. Indirect miniscrew anchorage: biomechanical loading of the dental anchorage during mandibular molar protraction - an FEM analysis. J Orofac Orthop 2014; 75(1):16-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-013-0190-8

Kim SH, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Chung KR, Kook YA, Nelson G. Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131(4 Suppl):S82-S89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.027

Morea C, Dominguez GC, Wuo AV, Tortamano A. Surgical guide for optimal positioning of mini-implants. J Clin Orthod 2005; 39(5):317-21.

Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, Carano A. “Safe zones”: a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod 2006; 76(2):191-7.

Kostenko YY, Goncharuk-Khomyn MY. Algorithm of analysis for panoramic X-ray images with purpose of calculation complex constant anthropometric indices of mandible and evaluation the atrophy level for alveolar part of lower jaw. Visnyk Morphologii 2013; 2(19):447-50.

Honcharuk-Khomyn MY, Kostenko YY. Anthropometric calculations of proportional relationships based on digital orthopantomograms. Buk Med Herald 2013; 17(3):45-6.

Forrest AS. Collection and recording of radiological information for forensic purposes. Aust Dent J 2012; 57(Suppl 1):24-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01658.x

Ursi WJ, Almeida RR, Tavano O, Henriques JF. Assessment of mesiodistal axial inclination through panoramic radiography. J Clin Orthod 1990; 24(3):166-73.

Katz DL, Jekel JF. Jekel's Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health. 4.th. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014.

Altman DG, Gardner MJ. Statistics in medicine: calculating confidence intervals for regression and correlation. Br Med J 1998; 296(6631):1238. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.296.6631.1238

Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983; 32:307-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2987937

Kaipatur N, Wu Y, Adeeb S, Stevenson T, Major P, Doschak M. A novel rat model of orthodontic tooth movement using temporary skeletal anchorage devices: 3D finite element analysis and in vivo validation. Int J Dent 2014; 2014: 917535. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/917535

Park JH, Chae JM, Bay RC, Kim MJ, Lee KY, Chang NY. Evaluation of factors influencing the success rate of orthodontic microimplants using panoramic radiographs. Korean J Orthod 2018; 48(1):30-8. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.1.30

Becker K, Wilmes B, Grandjean C, Vasudavan S, Drescher D. Skeletally anchored mesialization of molars using digitized casts and two surface-matching approaches. J Orofac Orthop 2018; 79(1):11-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-017-0108-y

Rusyn V, Goncharuk-Khomyn M. Alternative approach for the registration of peri-implant bone level changes at the remote rehabilitation period. Morphologia 2016; 10(2):77-84.

Devlin H, Yuan J. Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42(1):29951683. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/29951683

Yepes JF, Powers E, Downey T, Eckert GJ, Tang Q, Vinson L, Maupomé G. Prescription of panoramic radiographs in children: a health services assessment of current guidelines. Pediatr Dent 2017; 39(4):289-96.

Villarinho EA, Correia A, Vigo A, Ramos NV, Pires VM, Arai SR. Volumetric bone measurement around dental implants using 3D image superimposition: a methodological and clinical pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 2018; 31(1):23-30. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5366

Correia A, Villarinho E, Vigo A, Ramos NV, Vaz M, Shinkai R. Volumetric bone changes around dental implants, the use of 3D image superimposition. Clin Oral Implan Res 2017; 28(Suppl 14):245. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.244_13042

Goncharuk-Khomyn M, Andrii K. Evaluation of peri-implant bone reduction levels from superimposition perspective: pilot study among Ukrainian implantology practice. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr 2018; 18(1):3856. https://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2018.181.10

Bienz SP, Jung RE, Sapata VM, Hämmerle CH, Hüsler J, Thoma DS. Volumetric changes and peri‐implant health at implant sites with or without soft tissue grafting in the esthetic zone: a retrospective case-control study with a 5‐year follow‐up. Clin Oral Implan Res 2017; 28(11):1459-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13013

Sapata VM, Sanz-Martín I, Hämmerle CH, Cesar Neto JB, Jung RE, Thoma DS. Profilometric changes of peri‐ implant tissues over 5 years: A randomized controlled trial comparing a one‐and two‐piece implant system. Clin Oral Implan Res 2018; 29(8):864-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13308