Bactericidal and Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Herbal Alternatives Against Enterococcus Faecalis Dentinal Biofilm – An ex-vivo Study

Authors

  • Arunajatesan Subbiya
  • Krishnamurthy Roopchander
  • Krishnan Mahalakshmi
  • Kesavaram Padmavathy
  • Paramasivam Vivekanandan

Keywords:

Endodontics, Root Canal Therapy, Plant Preparations, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning

Abstract

Objective: To assess the antibacterial and smear layer removal ability of Trigonella foenum, Syzygium cumini, Terminalia chebula seed extracts against E. faecalis dentinal biofilm. Material and Methods: Agar well diffusion, micro broth dilution assay and time-kill curve assay were performed to determine the antibacterial activity. The ability of the herbal extracts to remove the smear layer on the root canal surface was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. Results: Antibacterial activity was observed for the extracts of S. cumini and T. chebula on E. faecalis dentinal biofilm and its planktonic counterparts. The smear layer was efficiently removed by the seed extracts of T. chebula alone. Seed extracts of T. foenum neither possessed antibacterial effect nor smear layer removal ability. Conclusion: The extracts of T. chebula seeds may replace conventional irrigant due to its antibacterial properties and smear layer removing the ability. The extracts of  S. cumini may be used as an intracanal medicament as it exhibited a bactericidal effect against the E. faecalis dentinal biofilm following 18 hours of incubation.

References

Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: Its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod 2006; 32(2):93-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.049

Arias-Moliz MT, Ferrer-Luque CM, González-Rodríguez MP, Valderrama MJ, Baca P. Eradication of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms by cetrimide and chlorhexidine. J Endod 2010; 36(1):87-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.013

Portenier I, Waltimo TMT, Haapasalo M. Enterococcus faecalis – the root canal survivor and ‘star’ in post- treatment disease. Endod Top 2003; 6(1):135-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2003.00040.x

Kayaoglu G, Orstavik D. Virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis: relationship to endodontic disease. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004; 15(5):308-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130401500506

Bryce G1, O'Donnell D, Ready D, Ng YL, Pratten J, Gulabivala K. Contemporary root canal irrigants are able to disrupt and eradicate single- and dual-species biofilms. J Endod 2009; 35(9):1243-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.05.034

Peters OA, Schönenberger K, Laib A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J 2001; 34(3):221-30. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00373.x

Torabinejad M1, Handysides R, Khademi AA, Bakland LK. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94(6):658-66. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.128962

de Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R, Paranjpe A, Cohenca N. Efficacy of different irrigation and activation systems on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals and up to working length: an in vitro study. J Endod 2010; 36(7):1216-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.019

Williamson AE, Cardon JW, Drake DR. Antimicrobial susceptibility of monoculture biofilms of a clinical isolate of Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2009; 35(1):95-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.09.004

Neglia R, Ardizzoni A, Giardino L, Ambu E, Grazi S, Calignano S, et al. Comparative in vitro and ex vivo studies on the bactericidal activity of Tetraclean, a new generation endodontic irrigant, and sodium hypochlorite. New Microbiol 2008; 31(1):57-65.

Ehrich DG, Brian JD Jr, Walker WA. Sodium hypochlorite accident: inadvertent injection into the maxillary sinus. J Endod 1993; 19(4):180-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80684-9

Becking AG. Complication in the use of sodium hypochlorite during endodontic therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 71:346-8.

Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int Endod J 2009; 42(4):288-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01540.x

Faria G, Celes MR, De Rossi A, Silva LA, Silva JS, Rossi MA. Evaluation of chlorhexidine toxicity injected in the paw of mice and added to cultured L929 fibroblasts. J Endod 2007; 33(6):715-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.023

Flammang AM, Cifone MA, Erexson GL, Stankowski LF Jr. Genotoxicity testing of a fenugreek extract. Food Chem Toxicol 2004; 42(11):1769-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.07.003

Nadkarni AK. Indian Materia Medica. Bombay: Popular Book Depot; 1976.

Gottfried SF. The raison of secondary plant substances. Science 2007; 129(3361):1466-70.

Meshram GA, Yadav SS, Shinde D, Patil B, Singh D. Antibacterial study and effect of ethanolic extracts of Syzygium cumini seeds powder on glucoamylase in vitro. Pharm Sci Res 2011; 3(2):1060-3.

Chopra R, Nayar S, Chopra I. Glossary of Indian Medicinal Plant. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; 1956. 249pp.

Fabry W, Okemo PO, Ansorg R. Antibacterial activity of East African medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol 1998; 60(1):79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8741(97)00128-1

Aneja KR, Joshi R. Evaluation of antimicrobial properties of fruit extracts of Terminalia chebula against dental caries pathogens. Jundishapur J Microbio 2009; 2(3):105-11.

Facklam RR, Carvalho MG, Teixeira LM. History, Taxonomy, Biochemical Characteristics, and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Enterococci. In: Gilmore MS (Editor). The Enterococci: Pathogenesis, Molecular Biology, and Antibiotic Resistance. Washington: ASM Press; 2002. p. 1-54.

Prabhakar J, Senthilkumar M, Priya MS, Mahalakshmi K, Sehgal PK, Sukumaran VG. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of herbal alternatives (Triphala and green tea polyphenols), MTAD, and 5% sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formed on tooth substrate: An in vitro study. J Endod 2010; 36(1):83-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.040

Socransky SS, Haffajee AD. Dental biofilms: difficult therapeutic targets. Periodontology 2000 2002; 28(1):12- 55. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2002.280102.x

Mala K. Endodontic biofilms - their formation and eradication: a review. J Nepal Dent Assoc 2011; 1(2):54-8.

Kishen A, George S, Kumar R. Enterococcus faecalis-mediated biomineralized biofilm formation on root canal dentine in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 77(2):406-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30622

Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, Pashley DH. Cytotoxic effects of NaOCl on vital tissue. J Endod 1985; 11(12):525-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80197-7

Downloads

Published

2022-03-19

How to Cite

Subbiya, A. ., Roopchander, K., Mahalakshmi, K. ., Padmavathy, K. ., & Vivekanandan, P. . (2022). Bactericidal and Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Herbal Alternatives Against Enterococcus Faecalis Dentinal Biofilm – An ex-vivo Study. Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clínica Integrada, 20, e5475. Retrieved from https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1123

Issue

Section

Original Articles