Determination of Shear Bond Strength of Nanocomposite to Porcelain and Metal Alloy
Keywords:
Dental Porcelain, Tooth Fractures, NanostructuresAbstract
Objective: To compare porcelain and metal repair done with both nanocomposite and conventional composite. Material and Methods: A total of 30 cylinders were fabricated from Porcelain (I), Porcelain fused to metal (II), and metal (III) substrate each. Control group (A) was bonded with conventional micro-hybrid composite and experimental group (B) was bonded with nanocomposite in a 2 mm thickness. All specimens were thermocycled and stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 7 days. A universal testing machine was used to measure the Shear bond strength (SBS). The difference between bond strengths of the groups was compared using an independent t-test. Results: In all three groups, the SBS was higher in the experimental group as compared to the control group. The use of nanocomposite of metal alloy presented maximum shear bond strength, followed by samples of porcelain fused to metal and finally porcelain, showing the lowest values of SBS. Conclusion: Porcelain and alloys bonded with nanocomposite exhibit enhanced adhesiveness as well as aesthetic and mechanical properties. This subsequently would translate into providing higher clinical serviceability and durability and hence a cost-effective and accessible repair option for human welfare.References
Malament KA, Natto ZS, Thompson V, Rekow D, Eckert S, Weber H-P. Ten-year survival of pressed, acid-etched e.max lithium disilicate monolithic and bilayered complete-coverage restorations: Performance and outcomes as a function of tooth position and age. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 121(5):782-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.024
Saha MK, Bansal S, Pathak V, Bhardwaj S, Chauhan A, Nirwan AS. A comparative evaluation of fracture load of monolithic and bilayered zirconia crowns with and without a cervical collar: an in vitro study. Med Pharm Rep 2019; 92(2):172-7. https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-985
Saeed F, Muhammad N, Khan AS, Sharif F, Rahim A, Ahmad P, et al. Prosthodontics dental materials: From conventional to unconventional. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2020; 106:110167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110167
Blatz MB, Vonderheide M, Conejo J. The effect of resin bonding on long-term success of high-strength ceramics. J Dent Res 2018; 97(2):132-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517729134
Abrisham SM, Fallah Tafti A, Kheirkhah S, Tavakkoli MA. Shear bond strength of porcelain to a base-metal compared to zirconia core. J Dent Biomater 2017; 4(1):367-72.
Yucel MT, Kilic I, Okutan Y, Tobi ES, Kilic HS, Kepceoglu A, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic and metal alloy. J Adh Sci Technol 2018; 32(20):2232-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1470363
Aslam A, Hassan SH, Nayyer M, Ahmed B. Intraoral repair protocols for fractured metal-ceramic restorations - literature review. S Afr Dent J 2018; 73(1):35-41. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC-d39a3f9e7
Zlatanovska KA, Dimova C, Gigovski N, Korunoska-Stevkovska V, Longurova N. Fracture localisation of porcelain veneers with different preparation designs. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019; 7(10):1675-9. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.323
Rodrigues CS, Dhital S, Kim J, May LG, Wolff MS, Zhang Y. Residual stresses explaining clinical fractures of bilayer zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns: A VFEM study. Dent Mater 2021; 37(11):1655-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.019
Krishnakumar S, Senthilvelan T. Polymer composites in dentistry and orthopedic applications - a review. Mater Today: Proc 2020; 46(19):9707-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.463
Mohanna DA, Abduljabbar T, Al-Sowygh ZH, Abu Hasan MI, Ab Ghani SM, Vohra F. Influence of silicoating, etching and heated glaze treatment on the surface of Y-TZP and its impact on bonding with veneering ceramic. J Adh Sci Technol 2018; 32(10):1055-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2017.1403278
Shafiei F, Behroozibakhsh M, Abbasian A, Shahnavazi S. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to base metal alloys having different surface treatments. Dent Res J 2018; 15(1):63-70. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.223610
Gharebagh TG, Hamedirad F, Miruzadeh K. Comparison of bond strength of acrylic, composite, and nanocomposite artificial teeth to heat-cure acrylic denture base resin. Front Dent 2019; 16(3):166-72. https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v16i3.1587
Kamada K, Taira Y, Watanabe I, Sawase T. Evaluation of five primers and two opaque resins for bonding ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina nanocomposite. J Dent Sci 2017; 12(1):91-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2016.05.004
Liu T, Wei H, Zhou A, Zou D, Jian H. Multiscale investigation on tensile properties of ultra-high performance concrete with silane coupling agent modified steel fibers. Cem Concr Compos 2020; 111:103638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103638
Maroulakos G, He J, Nagy WW. The post-endodontic adhesive interface: theoretical perspectives and potential flaws. J Endod 2018; 44(3):363-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.007
Agingu C, Zhang C-y, Jiang N-w, Cheng H, Özcan M, Yu H. Intraoral repair of chipped or fractured veneered zirconia crowns and fixed dental prosthesis: clinical guidelines based on literature review. J Adhes Sci Technol 2018; 32(15):1711-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1443639
Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu AC, Paolone G, Gherlone E, Ferracane JL, et al. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. J Dent 2017; 67:43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.012
Alavi AA, Behroozi Z, Nik Eghbal F. The shear bond strength of porcelain laminate to prepared and unprepared anterior teeth. J Dent 2017; 18(1):50-5.
Jang Y-S, Nguyen T-DT, Ko Y-H, Lee D-W, Baik BJ, Lee M-H, et al. In vitro wear behavior between enamel cusp and three aesthetic restorative materials: Zirconia, porcelain, and composite resin. J Adv Prothodont 2019; 11(1):7-15. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.1.7
Aslam A, Khan DA, Hassan SH, Ahmed B. Ceramic fracture in metal-ceramic restorations: the aetiology. Dent Update 2017; 44(5):448-50, 53-4, 56. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2017.44.5.448
Dhengar YS, Kumari D, Madihalli AU, Chandra A, Singh AK, Bhat BS. Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repairing system (Ivovlar Vivadent Repair System and Shofu Inc. Repair System). Ann Rom Soc Cell Biol 2021; 25(4):8640-6.
Benetti AR, Papia E, Matinlinna JP. Bonding ceramic restorations. Nor Tannlegeforen Tid 2019; 129:30-6.
Matinlinna JP, Lung CYK, Tsoi JKH. Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: A review. Dent Mater 2018; 34(1):13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.002
Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Silane-coupling effect of a silane-containing self-adhesive composite cement. Dent Mater 2020; 36(7):914-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.04.014
Conejo J, Ozer F, Mante F, Atria PJ, Blatz MB. Effect of surface treatment and cleaning on the bond strength to polymer-infiltrated ceramic network CAD-CAM material. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 126(5):698-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.016
Naseh R, Afshari M, Shafiei F, Rahnamoon N. Shear bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces using a universal bonding resin. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10(8):e739-e45. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.54175
Klaisiri A, Krajangta N, Peampring C, Thamrongananskul N, Neff A, Pitak-Arnnop P. Shear bond strength of different functional monomer in universal adhesives at the resin composite/base metal alloys interface. J Int Dent Med Res 2021; 14(1):187-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.024
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
