Effect of Water and Chlorhexidine with Different Pressures of Oral Irrigation Device on the Surface Roughness and Topography of Giomer
Keywords:Surface Properties, Biguanides, Composite Resins, Pressure
Objective: To evaluate the effect of different pressures of an oral irrigation device (OID) and the irrigation solution type on the surface roughness of the giomer restorative material. Material and Methods: In this in vitro study, disk-shaped giomer samples were fabricated and assigned to 5 groups (n=23): Group 1, storage in distilled water (control); Group 2, OID #7 pressure/ water; Group 3, OID #10 pressure/ water; Group 4, OID #7 pressure/ 0.05% CHX; Group 5, OID #10 pressure/ 0.05% CHX. The samples' treatment simulated a one-year application of OID. Surface roughness (Ra) and topography of the giomer were evaluated using profilometry and scanning electron microscopy. The data were analyzed with Paired t-test, Tukey, and ANOVA tests (α=0.05). Results: The Ra of the samples increased significantly after treatment with OID (p<0.001). The roughness increase in groups with a pressure of 10 was higher than those with a pressure of 7 (p<0.001). The effect of pressure on surface changes was significant (p<0.001). However, the solution type and the cumulative effect of these two factors were insignificant (p=0.08 and p=0.43, respectively). Conclusion: Oral irrigation device with both solutions significantly increased the surface roughness and topographic changes of the giomer. The severity of these changes was related to the device’s pressure.
Zanatta FB, Bergoli AD, Werle SB, Antoniazzi RP. Biofilm removal and gingival abrasion with medium and soft toothbrushes. Oral Health Prev Dent 2011; 9(2):177-183.
Versteeg PA, Piscaer M, Rosema NA, Timmerman MF, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden GA. Tapered toothbrush filaments in relation to gingival abrasion, removal of plaque and treatment of gingivitis. Int J Dent Hyg 2008; 6(3):174-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00284.x
Pelino JEP, Passero A, Martin AA, Charles CA. In vitro effects of alcohol-containing mouthwashes on human enamel and restorative materials. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32:e25. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0025
Moein N, Alavi FN, Salari A, Mojtahedi A, Tajer A. Effect of listerine mouthwash with green tea on the inhibition of Streptococcus mutans: A microbiologic study. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clín Integr 2020; 20:e5477. https://doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2020.106
Nasser Alavi F, Karimi Nasab N, Davalloo R. The effect of NaF mouthrinse, GC tooth mousse and GC mi paste plus on white spot inhibition: An in vitro study. J Dentomaxillofacial Radiol Pathol Surg 2012; 1(1):19-25. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.3dj.1.1.4
Boyle P, Koechlin A, Autier P. Mouthwash use and the prevention of plaque, gingivitis and caries. Oral Dis 2014; 20(Suppl 1):1-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12187
Ciancio SG. The dental water jet: A product ahead of its time. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2009; 30:7-13; quiz 14.
Jahn CA. The dental water jet: A historical review of the literature. J Dent Hyg 2010; 84(3):114-120.
Gorur A, Lyle DM, Schaudinn C, Costerton JW. Biofilm removal with a dental water jet. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2009; 30(1):1-6.
Pandya DJ, Manohar B, Mathur LK, Shankarapillai R. Comparative evaluation of two subgingival irrigating solutions in the management of periodontal disease: A clinicomicrobial study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2016; 20(6):597-602. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_328_16
Jolkovsky DL, Lyle DM. Safety of a water flosser: A literature review. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2015; 36(2):146-149.
Lepri CP, Palma-Dibb RG. Surface roughness and color change of a composite: Influence of beverages and brushing. Dent Mater J 2012; 31(4):689-696. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-063
Teng YT. The role of acquired immunity and periodontal disease progression. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003; 14(4):237-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130301400402
Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13(4):258-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(97)80038-3
Kimyai S, Pournaghi-Azar F, Naser-Alavi F, Salari A. Effect of disinfecting the cavity with chlorhexidine on the marginal gaps of Cl V giomer restorations. J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9(2):e202-e206. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53193
Rusnac ME, Gasparik C, Irimie AI, Grecu AG, Mesaroş AŞ, Dudea D. Giomers in dentistry - at the boundary between dental composites and glass-ionomers. Med Pharm Rep 2019; 92(2):123-128. https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1169
Furtado MM, Amorim A. Changes caused by the use of chlohexidine mouthwash in composite bulk-fill (in vitro). Ann Med 2019; 51(Suppl1):143. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2018.1561987
da Silva EM, de Sá Rodrigues CU, Dias DA, da Silva S, Amaral CM, Guimarães JG. Effect of toothbrushing-mouthrinse-cycling on surface roughness and topography of nanofilled, micro-filled, and microhybrid resin composites. Oper Dent 2014; 39(5):521-529. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-199-L
Naser-Alavi F, Salari A, Moein N, Talebzadeh A. Effect of oral irrigation device and its solution type on the surface roughness and topography of Bulk-fill composite resins. J Clin Exp Dent 2022; 14(2):e123-e130. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59004
Alharbi M, Farah R. Effect of water-jet flossing on surface roughness and color stability of dental resin-based composites. J Clin Exp Dent 2020; 12(2):e169-e177. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56153
Mohammadi N, Alavi FN, Rikhtehgaran S, Chaharom MEE, Salari A, Kimyai S, et al. Effect of bleaching method and curing time on the surface microhardness of microhybrid composite resin. Maedica 2020; 15(3):359-364. https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2020.15.3.359
Rezaei Sofi L, Khamverdi Z, Kasraei S, Vahdatinia F, Nasr F. The effect of hydrogen peroxide 35% on surface roughness of silorane and methacrylate based composites. Avicenna J Clin Med 2015; 22(1):23-29. [In Persian].
Arora V, Bogra P. Giomer – A new hybrid aesthetic restorative material. J Conserv Dent 2002; 5(4):149-155.
Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Ohmiti K, Rousson V. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load. Dent Mater 2010; 26(4):306-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.152
Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2005; 26(24):4932-4937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.026
Wattanapayungkul P, Yap AU, Chooi KW, Lee MF, Selamat RS, Zhou RD. The effect of home bleaching agents on the surface roughness of tooth-colored restoratives with time. Oper Dent 2004; 29(4):398-403.
Gonulol N, Ozer S, Sen Tunc E. Water sorption, solubility, and color stability of giomer restoratives. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015; 27(5):300-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12119
Sarrett DC, Coletti DP, Peluso AR. The effects of alcoholic beverages on composite wear. Dent Mater 2000; 16(1):62-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00088-3
Tanthanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B, Siriporananon C, Ornprasert N, Mettasitthikorn W, Likhitpreeda S, et al. The effect of different beverages on surface hardness of nanohybrid resin composite and giomer. J Conserv Dent 2017; 17(3):261-265. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131791
da Silva EM, Gonçalves L, Guimarães JG, Poskus LT, Fellows CE. The diffusion kinetics of a nanofilled and a midifilled resin composite immersed in distilled water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Clin Oral Investig 2011; 15(3):393-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0392-z
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.