Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam versus Nitrous Oxide as Sedative Agents during Paediatric Dental Treatment: A Systematic Review

Palak Janiani; Deepa Gurunathan

Authors

Palak Janiani
Deepa Gurunathan

Keywords:

Deep Sedation, Midazolam, Nitrous Oxide, Child

Abstract

Objective: To identify and study the existing literature on the efficacy and safety of midazolam compared to inhalation of nitrous oxide in children undergoing dental treatment. Material and Methods: Electronic resources such as PubMed Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Lilacs, Science Direct, and SIGLE were thoroughly searched. The title scan was used to find randomised controlled trials reviewed for inclusion by reading the abstract. Studies comparing the sedative, behavioural, and anxiolytic effects and safety in children undergoing dental treatment under midazolam and nitrous oxide inhalation were included. The Cochrane Reviews system software, Revman 5.4.1, was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Results: 11328 articles were identified by screening the electronic databases, of which 10906 were eliminated after titles were read and duplicates were removed. Ten full-text articles were examined, of which three were excluded as they did not match the eligibility criteria. Hence, a total of 7 studies were included. Midazolam and nitrous oxide inhalation were not statistically different in terms of the success of treatment and behaviour modification. However, midazolam showed a deeper level of sedation and resulted in amnesia in more children when compared to nitrous oxide sedation. All of the included studies were found to have a high risk of bias. Conclusion: Though all the studies included showed an increased risk of bias, midazolam and nitrous oxide inhalation seem equally effective sedative agents for controlling behaviour in children undergoing dental treatment. Midazolam shows a deeper sedation level when given orally and produces a higher rate of anterograde amnesia.

References

American Dental Association. Wells H. Horace Wells, dentist, father of surgical anesthesia: Proceedings of centenary commemorations of Wells; discovery in 1844 of lists of Wells' memorabilia, including bibliographies, meorials and testimonials. Hartford: Case, Lockwood and Brainard; 1948. 415p.

Satya Prakash MVS, Sivasankar S, Elakkumanan LB, Mohan VK, Kamaladevi RK. Comparison of medication acceptance of intranasal midazolam administered by parents versus doctors in children - A randomized trial. Indian J Pharmacol 2020; 52(4):254-259. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.IJP_418_19

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Guideline on appropriate use of nitrous oxide for pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent 2008; 30(7 Suppl):140-142.

Council of European Dentists. CED resolution on the use of nitrous oxide inhalation sedation – Update. Available from: https://www.omd.pt/content/uploads/2019/12/CED-DOC-2019-055-E.pdf [Accessed on].

Wong YC, Zuo Z. Intranasal delivery--modification of drug metabolism and brain disposition. Pharm Res 2010; 27(7):1208-1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-010-0127-5

Preethy NA, Somasundaram S. Sedative and behavioral effects of intranasal midazolam in comparison with other administrative routes in children undergoing dental treatment - A systematic review. Contemp Clin Dent 2021; 12(2):105-120. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_470_20

Sharma S, Chopra R, Mathur S, Sachdev V, Gupta K. Variations in physiological, psychomotor, and analgesic parameters during titration of nitrous oxide in 3-12 years old children managed with inhalation sedation. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020; 13(6):650-655. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1852

Wilson KE, Girdler NM, Welbury RR. Randomized, controlled, cross-over clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam sedation with nitrous oxide sedation in children undergoing dental extractions. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91(6):850-856. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeg278

Papineni A, Lourenço-Matharu L, Ashley PF. Safety of oral midazolam sedation use in paediatric dentistry: a review. Int J Paediatr Dent 2014; 24(1):2-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12017

Malamed SF. Sedation: A guide to patient management. St. Louis: Mosby Incorporated; 2003. 608p.

Sheta SA, Alsarheed M. Oral midazolam premedication for children undergoing general anaesthesia for dental care. Int J Pediatr 2009; 2009:274380. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/274380

Asnani KH. Essentials of Pediatric Dentistry. Nepal: Jaypee Brothers Medical Pub; 2010. 260p.

Sivaramakrishnan G, Sridharan K. Nitrous oxide and midazolam sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Prog 2017; 64(2):59-65. https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-63-03-06

al-Rakaf H, Bello LL, Turkustani A, Adenubi JO. Intra-nasal midazolam in conscious sedation of young paediatric dental patients. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11(1):33-40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263x.2001.00237.x

Samir PV, Namineni S, Sarada P. Assessment of hypoxia, sedation level, and adverse events occurring during inhalation sedation using preadjusted mix of 30% nitrous oxide + 70%oxygen. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2017; 35(4):338-345. https://doi.org/10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_15_17

Lahoud GY, Averley PA. Comparison of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide mixture with nitrous oxide alone for inhalation conscious sedation in children having dental treatment: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2002; 57(5):446-450. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0003-2409.2002.02569.x

Higgins JPT, Thomas J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2019.

Wilson KE, Welbury RR, Girdler NM. A randomised, controlled, cross-over trial of oral midazolam and nitrous oxide for paediatric dental sedation. Anaesthesia 2002; 57(9):860-867. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02784.x

Wilson KE, Welbury RR, Girdler NM. A study of the effectiveness of oral midazolam sedation for orthodontic extraction of permanent teeth in children: a prospective, randomised, controlled, cross-over trial. Br Dent J 2002; 192(8):457-462. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801400

Wilson KE, Girdler NM, Welbury RR. A comparison of oral midazolam and nitrous oxide sedation for dental extractions in children. Anaesthesia 2006; 61(12):1138-1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04835.x

Wilson KE, Welbury RR, Girdler NM. Comparison of transmucosal midazolam with inhalation sedation for dental extractions in children. A randomized, cross-over, clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51(8):1062-1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01391.x

Srinivasan NK, Karunagaran P, Panchal V, Subramanian E. Comparison of the sedative effect of inhaled nitrous oxide and intranasal midazolam in behavior management and pain perception of pediatric patients: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021; 14(Suppl 2):S111-S116. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2085

Ann Preethy N, Somasundaram S. Safety and physiologic effects of intranasal midazolam and nitrous oxide inhalation based sedation in children visiting Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, India. Bioinformation 2022; 18(1):26-35. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630018026

Knoester PD, Jonker DM, Van Der Hoeven RT, Vermeij TA, Edelbroek PM, Brekelmans GJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam administered as a concentrated intranasal spray. A study in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 53(5):501-507. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01588.x

Tyagi P, Dixit U, Tyagi S, Jain A. Sedative effects of oral midazolam, intravenous midazolam and oral diazepam. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012; 36(4):383-388. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.36.4.t1j3625831144371

Girdler NM, Hill CM. Sedation in Dentistry. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998.

Zhang Y, Li C, Shi J, Gong Y, Zeng T, Lin M, et al. Comparison of dexmedetomidine with midazolam for dental surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2020; 99(43):e22288. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022288