Comparison of Surface Defects in Different Rotary Files: An in-Vitro Study
Keywords:
Elasticity, Endodontics, Microscopy, Alloys, Root Canal PreparationAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the surface defects in Wave One Gold and Jizai rotary files after 1 and 3 uses. Material and Methods: Ninety-six resin blocks with stimulated canals and 12 files per system were used. The files were pre-examined under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to exclude files with pre-existing cracks and craters. Instrumentation and SEM evaluation of the files were performed after 1 and 3 uses, respectively. Two independent operators analyzed the images, and scoring was carried out for each file's coronal, middle, and apical thirds. The surface defects at different thirds of the file systems were analyzed using the Chi-Square test and Kendel Tau’s test. Results: After one use, both the file systems did not produce any significant surface defects in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds. However, after three uses, there was minor plastic deformation in the coronal and middle thirds of the Wave One Gold file system. Jizai file system did not produce any surface defects in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds. Conclusion: After one use, no surface defects were created in Wave One gold and Jizai rotary files. Wave One Gold exhibited more significant surface defects after three uses in the coronal and middle thirds.
References
Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988; 14(7):346-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(88)80196-1
Schäfer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: A clinical study. J Endod 2004; 30(6):432-435. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200406000-00014
Chen JL, Messer HH. A comparison of stainless-steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique. Aust Dent J 2002; 47(2):12-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819. 2002.tb00297.x
Garip Y, Gunday M. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel titanium and stainless-steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2001; 34(6):452-457. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00416.x
Schäfer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless-steel hand K-Flexo files in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92(2):15-22. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.114622
De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Vieira VT, Belladonna FG, Elias CN, Plotino G. Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the reciproc files. J Endod 2017; 43(4):62-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.039
Spicciarelli V, Corsentino G, Ounsi HF, Ferrari M, Grandini S. Shaping effectiveness and surface topography of reciprocating files after multiple simulated uses. J Oral Sci 2019; 61(1):45-52. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.17-0311
Gavini G, Santos MD, Caldeira CL, Machado MEL, Freire LG, Iglecias EF. Nickel-titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32(1):67-68. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0067
Kim HC, Yum J, Hur B, Cheung GS. Cyclic fatigue and fracture characteristics of ground and twisted nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2010; 36(1):147-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.037
Zanza A, D'Angelo M, Reda R, Gambarini G, Testarelli L, Di Nardo D. An update on nickel-titanium rotary instruments in endodontics: Mechanical characteristics, testing and future perspective-An overview. Bioengineering 2021; 8(12):218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.037
van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F, Vorster M, de Wet FA. Root canal shaping using nickel titanium, m-wire, and gold wire: a micro-computed tomographic comparative study of one shape, protaper next, and waveone gold instruments in maxillary first molars. J Endod 2019; 45(1):62-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.013
Purayil T, Ballal N, Ginjupalli K. Comparative evaluation of surface defects in single file rotary systems before and after instrumentation in curved root canals. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2018; 26(3):130-135. https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_01714Purayil06
Marending M, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Scanning electron microscope appearances of Lightspeed instruments used clinically: A pilot study. Int Endod J 1998; 31(1):57-62. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.t01-1-00104.x
Qaed NA, Mourshed BD, Al-Shamiri HM, Alaizari N, Alhamdah SS. The effect of surface topographical changes of two different surface treatments rotary instrument. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10(1):49-53. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.54472
Deopujari J, Singh H, Pathak I. Evaluation of microcracks formed during root canal preparation by different file systems using micro-computed tomography: An in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23(1):74–78. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3238
Pirani C, Ruggeri O, Cirulli PP, Pelliccioni GA, Gandolfi MG, Prati C. Metallurgical analysis and fatigue resistance of WaveOne and ProTaper nickel-titanium instruments. Odontology 2014; 102(2):211–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-013-0113-6
Türker SA, Sağlam BC, Koçak MM, Koçak S. The effect of glide path on the surface quality of new and used rotary and reciprocating single files: OneShape versus WaveOne. Scanning 2014; 36(6):608-613 https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21161
Gawdat SI, El Nasr H. Shaping ability and surface topography of WaveOne Gold and OneShape single files. ENDO 2018; 12(2):109-118. https://doi.org/10.35637/894829/00429.x
Fatma Y, Ozgur U. Evaluation of surface topography changes in three NiTi file systems using rotary and reciprocal motion: an atomic force microscopy study. Microsc Res Tech 2014; 77(3):177-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22325
Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Uslu G, Plotino G. The effect of root canal preparation on the surface roughness of WaveOne and WaveOne Gold files: Atomic force microscopy study. Restor Dent Endo 2018; 43(1):e10. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e10
Schäfer E, Tepel J. Relationship between design features of endodontic instruments and their properties Part 3 Resistance to bending and fracture. J Endod 2001; 27(4):299-303. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200104000-00018
Silva EJNL, Martins JNR, Versiani MA. Advancing insights in contemporary endodontics: Proposing a multimethod approach for comprehensive evaluation of NiTi instruments. Int Endod J 2024; 57(2):116-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
