A Comprehensive Survey of Natural Smile Perception

Authors

  • Alaa Ibrahim Mannaa

Keywords:

Surveys and Questionnaires, Dentistry, Face, Beauty

Abstract

Objective: To comprehensively analyze smile perception by examining various smile parameters and identifying potential group differences. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing a photographic-based electronic survey. Participants' demographic data were collected, and their perception of smile photos, altered across 12 parameters, was assessed using a Likert scale. The study included laypersons, dental students at different academic levels, and dental professionals. Statistical analyses were performed to analyze ratings and determine group differences. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: A total of 435 participants completed the survey. Neither ordinal regression nor linear regression yielded any significant associations between individual photos and perception across groups (p>0.05). However, chi-square analysis revealed six events with statistically significant differences among groups, with laypersons exhibiting significant differences in four of them (p=0.009, p=0.012, and p=0.017). Conclusion: The limited statistically significant differences in perception between the study groups could be a consequence of the naturally-looking photo edits that may have posed challenges in recognizing subtle alterations and eye fatigue from viewing numerous duplicate photos. Future research should address such limitations to enhance our understanding of smile perception across diverse groups.

References

Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23(4):313-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.022

Almedlej R, Aldosary R, Barakah R, Alkhalifah A, Adlan A, AlSaffan AD, et al. Dental esthetic and the likelihood of finding a job in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care 2020; 9(1):276-281. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_742_19

Bhuvaneswaran M. Principles of smile design. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13(4):225-232. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.73387

Manjula WS, Sukumar MR, Kishorekumar S, Gnanashanmugam K, Mahalakshmi K. Smile: A review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015; 7(Suppl 1):S271-275. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.155951

Poon R. The perfect smile – Part 3. Br Dent J 2018; 225(7):589-590. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.888

do Rosário Dias M, Ferreira A, Pires MC, Alves V, Delgado A. Orthodontic smile: A new categorization of the perfect smile. Eur J Gen Dent 2020; 9(03):129-133. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejgd.ejgd_157_20

Baik KM, Anbar G, Alshaikh A, Banjar A. Effect of social media on patient's perception of dental aesthetics in Saudi Arabia. Int J Dent 2022; 2022:4794497. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4794497

Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, Lagravere MO, Major PW. Lay person's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Orthod 2004; 31(3):204-209; discussion 201. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531204225022416

Millar BJ. Smile design integrating esthetics and function: Essentials in esthetic dentistry. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.

Aldeeri AA, Alhababi KA, Algahtani FA, Tounsi AA, Albadr KI. Perception of altered smile esthetics by orthodontists, dentists, and laypeople in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2020; 12:563-570. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S272226

Dunn WJ, Murchison DF, Broome JC. Esthetics: Patients' perceptions of dental attractiveness. J Prosthodont 1996; 5(3):166-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1532-849X.1996.TB00292.X

Geevarghese A, Baskaradoss JK, Alsalem M, Aldahash A, Alfayez W, Alduhaimi T, et al. Perception of general dentists and laypersons towards altered smile aesthetics. J Orthod Sci 2019; 8:14. https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_103_18

Khalaf K, Seraj Z, Hussein H. Perception of smile aesthetics of patients with anterior malocclusions and lips influence: A comparison of dental professionals', dental students,' and laypersons' opinions. Int J Dent 2020; 2020:8870270. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8870270

Krajangta N, Phumpatrakom P, Supachartwong C, Kamolwarin P, Leelaponglit S. Influence of lip appearances and tooth shade on smile attractiveness perception. Int J Dentistry 2022; 2022:5952643. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5952643

Sadrhaghighi H, Zarghami A, Sadrhaghighi S, Eskandarinezhad M. Esthetic perception of smile components by orthodontists, general dentists, dental students, artists, and laypersons. J Investig Clin Dent 2017; 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12235

Almanea R, Modimigh A, Almogren F, Alhazzani E. Perception of smile attractiveness among orthodontists, restorative dentists, and laypersons in Saudi Arabia. J Conserv Dent 2019; 22(1):69-75. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_429_18

Pinho T. Assessment of the perception of smile esthetics by laypersons, dental students and dental practitioners. Int Orthod 2013; 11(4):432-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ORTHO.2013.09.007

Ioi H, Nakata S, Counts AL. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese. Angle Orthod 2009; 79(4):628-633. https://doi.org/10.2319/080708-410.1

Mokhtar HA, Abuljadayel LW, Al-Ali RM, Yousef M. The perception of smile attractiveness among Saudi population. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2015; 7:17-23. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S74764

Babeer WA, Bakhsh ZT, Natto ZS. The perception of smile attractiveness to altered vertical position of maxillary anteriors by various groups. Medicine 2022; 101(9):e28660. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028660

Martins JM, Costa LG, Carvalho AL, Manso MC, Gavinha S, Herrero-Climent M, et al. The impact of dental midline on asymmetric faces: Perspective of laypersons and dentists. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18(24):12904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182412904

Schwefer N, Freitag-Wolf S, Meyer G, Kern M. Investigation of the esthetic perception of different canine parameters. Clin Oral Investigations 2022; 26(12):6973-6983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04651-2

Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Al‐Mashraqi AA, Al‐Homoud M, Wafi S, Zakari A, et al. Perception of facial, dental, and smile esthetics by dental students. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30(5):415-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12405

Atik E, Turkoglu H. Does different vertical position of maxillary central incisors in women with different facial vertical height affect smile esthetics perception? Prog Orthod 2023; 24(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00479-y

Machado RM, Duarte ME, da Motta AF, Mucha JN, Motta AT. Variations between maxillary central and lateral incisal edges and smile attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 150(3):425-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.022

Alhammadi M. Perception of facial esthetics by laypersons, dental assistants, general dental practitioners and dental specialists. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20(3):304-310. https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10024-2514

Alomari SA, Alhaija ES, AlWahadni AM, Al-Tawachi AK. Smile microesthetics as perceived by dental professionals and laypersons. Angle Orthod 2022; 92(1):101-109. https://doi.org/10.2319/020521-108.1

Downloads

Published

2025-02-15

How to Cite

Mannaa, A. I. (2025). A Comprehensive Survey of Natural Smile Perception. Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clínica Integrada, 25, e240006. Retrieved from https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/4306

Issue

Section

Original Articles