Efficacy of Higher Gauged Needles or Topical Pre-Cooling for Pain Reduction during Local Anesthesia Injection: A Split-Mouth Randomized Trial
Keywords:
Dental Anxiety, Pain, Local Anesthesia, Visual Analog ScaleAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of pre-cooling and the use of higher gauged needles in reducing pain during local anesthetic infiltration. Material and Methods: We conducted a split-mouth randomized controlled trial among 70 patients who require bilateral maxillary local anesthetic (LA) injections for dental treatment. After applying the topical anesthetic, each participant received four local anesthetic injections, two on buccal and two palatal sides. At each visit, the participants received one buccal and one palatal infiltration based on the randomization. On the buccal aspect, participants received LA with a 26G needle injection on one side (control) and a 31G needle (test) on the contralateral side. On the Palatal aspect, participants either received LA with a 31G needle on one side (control). In contrast, the opposite side was preceded by topical ice application (iced cotton swab) before LA with a 31G needle (test). Both the visits were spaced with a gap of 7-10 days based on the participants' feasibility. Participants were asked to rate the pain on a visual analog scale independently for buccal and palatal LA injections. Results: On the Buccal aspect, the mean pain scores were 2.74 ± 1.26 and 2.11 ± 1.26 for control and test groups, respectively (p=0.002). On the Palatal aspect, the mean pain scores were 4.14 ± 1.49 and 4.3 ± 1.80 for control and test groups, respectively (p=0.295). Conclusion: Significant lower pain scores were reported with higher gauge needles (31G) when compared to traditional (26G) needles on the buccal aspect. No significant difference was seen with pre-cooling the injection site on the palatal aspect when used with higher gauged needles (31G).
References
Treede RD. The International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: as valid in 2018 as in 1979, but in need of regularly updated footnotes. PAIN Rep 2018; 3(2):e643. https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000643
National Research Council (US) Committee on Recognition and Alleviation of Pain in Laboratory Animals. Recognition and Alleviation of Pain in Laboratory Animals. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009.
Lehtinen R. Penetration of 27- and 30-gauge dental needles. Int J Oral Surg 1983; 12(6):444-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9785(83)80036-2
Lee H-S. Recent advances in topical anesthesia. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2016; 16(4):237-44. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.4.237
Farsakian LR, Weine FS. The significance of needle gauge in dental injections. Compendium 1991; 12(4):262, 264-8.
Bartfield JM, Crisafulli KM, Raccio-Robak N, Salluzzo RF. The Effects of warming and buffering on pain of infiltration of lidocaine. Acad Emerg Med 1995; 2(4):254-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03218.x
Kanaa MD, Meechan JG, Corbett IP, Whitworth JM. Speed of injection influences efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve blocks: a double-blind randomized controlled trial in volunteers. J Endod 2006; 32(10):919-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.004
Aminabadi NA, Farahani RMZ. The effect of Pre-cooling the injection site on pediatric pain perception during the administration of local anesthesia. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10(3):43-50. https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-10-3-43
Kosaraju A, Vandewalle KS. A comparison of a refrigerant and a topical anesthetic gel as preinjection anesthetics A clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140(1):68-72. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0020
Nasehi A, Bhardwaj S, Kamath A-T, Gadicherla S, Pentapati K-C. Clinical pain evaluation with intraoral vibration device during local anesthetic injections. J Clin Exp Dent 2015; 7(1):e23-e27. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51643
Ghorbanzadeh S, Alimadadi H, Zargar N, Dianat O. Effect of vibratory stimulation on pain during local anesthesia injections: a clinical trial. Restor Dent Endod 2019; 44(4):e40. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e40
Salati AS. Minimizing the pain in local anesthesia injection: A review. J Pakistan Assoc Dermatol 2016; 26(2):138-43.
Strazar AR, Leynes PG, Lalonde DH. Minimizing the pain of local anesthesia injection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132(3):675-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ad1e2
Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 1994; 56(2):217-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3
McPherson JS, Dixon SA, Townsend R, Vandewalle KS. Effect of needle design on pain from dental local anesthetic injections. Anesth Prog 2015; 62(1):2-7. https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-62.1.2
Fuller NP, Menke RA, Meyers WJ. Perception of pain to three different intraoral penetrations of needles. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 99(5):822-4. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0384
Flanagan T, Wahl MJ, Schmitt MM, Wahl JA. Size doesn’t matter: needle gauge and injection pain. Gen Dent 2007; 55(3):216-7.
Mollen AJ, Ficara AJ, Provant DR. Needles - 25 gauge versus 27 gauge - can patients really tell? Gen Dent 1981; 29(5):417-8.
Lathwal G, Pandit IK, Gugnani N, Gupta M. Efficacy of different precooling agents and topical anesthetics on the pain perception during intraoral injection: a comparative clinical study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 8(2):119-22. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1296
Jayasuriya NSS, Weerapperuma ID, Amarasinghe MGCK. The use of an iced cotton bud as an effective pre-cooling method for palatal anaesthesia: A technical note. Singapore Dent J 2017; 38:17-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdj.2017.07.001
Ghaderi F, Banakar S, Rostami S. Effect of pre-cooling injection site on pain perception in pediatric dentistry: A randomized clinical trial. Dent Res J 2013; 10(6):790-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.122486.
McKemy DD. The molecular and cellular basis of cold sensation. ACS Chem Neurosci 2013; 4(2):238-47. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn300193h
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.