TENSIONS AND THE INTERNATIONAL ORDER: BIBLIOGRAPHIC REVIEW AND A STRUCTURAL PERSPECTIVE OF THE CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FROM ENGLISH SCHOOL DEBATES
Keywords:
Structure, International Society, International Order, Tensions, English SchoolAbstract
From a bibliographical review of English School authors on tensions about the international order, this article proposes an analytical formulation of the normative structuring of contemporary international society based on concepts of democracy, development, and human rights. Discussions on perspectives about tensions between order and justice (BULL, 1977); primary institutions (VINCENT, 1986; WHEELER, 2000; BUZAN, 2004; KEENE, 2004); pluralism and solidarism (BUZAN, 2004; WHELER, 2000); vanguardism and syncretism (BUZAN, 2010); and the tolerant and civilising
aspects of international law and the UN system (GONG, 1984; KEAL, 2003; KEENE, 2004) will be presented. Then, it is proposed that the contemporary international order is a vanguardist and pluralist order, configured by the principle of tolerance and mutual recognition of sovereignty among states.
References
ACOSTA, A. (2013) El Buen Vivir: Sumak Kawsay, una oportunidad para imaginar otros
mundos Más Allá Del Desarrollo. Revista de Economia Mundial (33): 265-269.
ALDERSON, K.; HURREL, A. (2010) Hedley Bull on International Society. Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan, p. 20–53..
BHASKAR, R. (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism: a Philosophical Critique of the
Contemporary Human Sciences. 2 ed. Brighton: Harvester..
BULL, H. (1977) A Sociedade Anárquica: Um Estudo da Ordem na Política Mundial.
London: Palgrave Macmillan.
BUZAN, B. (2004) From International to World Society. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press and British International Studies Association (BISA).
______. (2010) Culture and international society. International Affairs. 86 (1): 1–26..
BUZAN, B; PELAEZ, A. G. (2003) A Viable Project of Solidarism? The Neglected
Contributions of John Vincent’s Basic Rights Initiative. International Relations, 17(3): 321–
CLARK, I. (2001) Another ‘double movement’: the great transformation after the Cold War?.
Review of International Studies, 27 (5): 237–255, December.
______. (2005) Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GIDDENS, A. (1981) A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. London:
Palgrave Macmillan.
GONG, G. W. (1984) The Standard of 'Civilization' in International Society. New York:
Clarendon Press/ Oxford University Press. New York, p. 236-248.
HOLLIS, M; SMITH, S. (1990) Explaining and Understanding international relations.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
IKENBERRY, G. J. (2009) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the
Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
KEENE, E. (2004) Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World
Politics. Cambridge: Centre for International Studies, London School of Economics and
Political Science. University of Cambridge.
KEAL, P. (2003) European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The moral
backwardness of International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press p. 107-112.
MURPHY, S. D. (1999) Democratic Legitimacy and the Recognition of States and
Governments.: The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 48 (3): 545- 581.
OAS. Declaração e Programação de Viena, Conferência Mundial sobre Direitos Humanos,
de 14 a 25 de junho de 1993, publicada em [https://www.oas.org/dil/port/
%20Declaração%20e%20Programa%20de%20Acção%20adoptado%20pela%20Conferê
ncia%20Mundial%20de%20Viena%20sobre%20Direitos%20Humanos%20em%20junho%20
de%201993.pdf]. Disponibilidade: 20/02/2019.
OHCHR. Declaração Universal de Direitos Humanos, de 10 de dezembro de 1948,
publicada em [https://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/por.pdf].
Disponibilidade: 20/02/2019.
ONU. Carta da Organização das Nações Unidas de 1945, de 24 de outubro de 1945,
publicada em [https://nacoesunidas.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/A-Carta-das-NaçõesUnidas.pdf]. Disponibilidade: 09/08/2019.
PIOVESAN, F. (2013). Direitos humanos e o direito constitucional internacional. São
Paulo : Saraiva.
TRUMAN DOCTRINE: President Harry S. Truman's Address Before A Joint Session Of
Congress, de 12 de março de 1947, publicada em [http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/
trudoc.asp]. Disponibilidade: 10/07/2019.
VINCENT, R. J. (1986) Human Rights and International Relations: Issues and Responses.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WENDT, A. (1998) On Constitution and Causation in International Relations. Review of
International Studies, 24: 101-117. December. The Eighty Years' Crisis 1919-1999.
WHEELER, N. (2000) Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International
Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WIGHT, C. (2006) Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WIGHT, G.; PORTER, B. (1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions: Martin Wight,.
Leicester: Leicester University Press/Royal Institute of International Affairs.
