The Indo-Pacific Geostrategy and the Quad: The Pacific Century and China-USA Disputes

Autores

Palavras-chave:

China, United States, Asia, Geopolitics

Resumo

In 2011, during the Obama administration (2009-2017), changes in the course of the United States' geostrategy for Asia were named America's Pacific Century; which marks the shift in the US foreign policy towards a focus on the Pacific in the 21st century, and on the great powers present in the region, mainly China. Such actions are mainly based on the geopolitics of Offensive Realism as a strategic premise.

In order to oppose the Chinese rise in the interstate system and maintain the primacy of its interests in Asia, the US proposes the Indo-Pacific strategy, in order to balance the Chinese role in the continent; in addition to the formation of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad), together with Japan, Australia, and India, to establish a security partnership with those considered the greatest adversaries, in the US view, to Chinese interests in the Pacific. This strategy for Asia seeks to counteract the gradual Chinese preponderance in the Asia-Pacific region.

Therefore, this article proposes to analyse the origins and main motivations for the establishment of a structure to contain China in the Pacific by the United States, as well as the Chinese positions and considerations for the region.

Biografia do Autor

Lucas Gualberto do Nascimento, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)

Doutorando em Economia Política Internacional (PEPI-UFRJ), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). Mestre em Ciências Sociais (PPGCS-UNESP), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP).

Marcos Cordeiro Pires, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)

Doutor em História Econômica, pela Universidade de São Paulo (2002) e Livre Docente em Economia Política Internacional pela Unesp (2013). É professor na UNESP - Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - Campus de Marília, nos cursos de graduação em Relações Internacionais e pós-graduação em Ciências Sociais e no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Relações Internacionais "San Tiago Dantas" - Unesp- PUC-SP- Unicamp.

Referências

BANDEIRA, L.A.M. (2017). The Second Cold War [A Segunda Guerra Fria]. Geopolitics and the Strategic Dimensions of the USA. Springer.

BBC (2021). Aukus: China denounces US-UK-Australia pact as irresponsible. Disponível em: <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-58582573>. Acesso em: 25/01/2023.

BRZEZINSKI, Z. (1998) The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. Basic Books.

CHAUDHURY, D. (2020). India-China activate 5 pacts to defuse LAC tensions. The Economic Times. Disponível em: <https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/india-china-activates-5-pacts-to-defuse-lac-tensions/articleshow/76083868.cms>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

CLINTON, H. (2011). America's Pacific Century. US Department of State (DoS).

Disponível em:

<https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2011/11/176999.htm>

Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

COSTA, W. (2008) Geografia política e geopolítica: discursos sobre o território e o poder. São Paulo: Edusp.

COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS (CFR) (2022). Tensions in the East China Sea. Center for Preventive Action, CFR. Disponível em: <https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/tensions-east-china-sea>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DoD) (2022). Fact Sheet: 2022 National Defense Strategy. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington D.C. Disponível em: <https://media.defense.gov/2022/Mar/28/2002964702/-1/-1/1/NDS-FACT-SHEET.PDF>.

Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

_______________________________(2018). National Defense Strategy. The United States of America: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge (Summary Version). Washington D.C.

Disponível em: <https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DoS) (2019). A Free and Open Indo-Pacific: Advancing a Shared Vision. U.S. Department of State, Washington D.C. Disponível em: <https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Free-and-Open-Indo-Pacific-4Nov2019.pdf>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

HEYDARIAN, R. (2021). Quad summit next step towards an Asian NATO. Asia Times, 2021. Disponível em: <https://asiatimes.com/2021/03/quad-summit-next-step-towards-an-asian-nato/>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

HURST, D. (2022). Caroline Kennedy praises Australia’s bipartisan foreign policy despite PM’s claims on Labor and China. The Guardian. Disponível em: <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/08/caroline-kennedy-praises-australias-bipartisan-foreign-policy-despite-pms-claims-on-labor-and-china>. Acesso em: 25/01/2023.

JÚNIOR, A. (2017). Geopolítica: do pensamento clássico aos conflitos contemporâneos. Curitiba: Intersaberes.

KHALIQ, R. (2022). China, Japan engage in verbal duel over disputed islands. Istambul: AA. Disponível em: <https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/china-japan-engage-in-verbal-duel-over-disputed-islands/2629878#>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

KYODO (2012). U.S. says Senkaku Islands fall within scope of Japan-U.S. security treat. Washington D.C.: Kyodo News. Disponível em: <https://web.archive.org/web/20120715062037/http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2012/07/168715.html>. Acesso em 05/08/2022.

LUKIN, A. (2020). Sino-Russian Cooperation as the Basis for Greater Eurasia. Human Affairs, n. 30, p. 174-188. DOI: 10.1515/humaff-2020-0017

MEARSHEIMER, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Nova York/Londres: W.W. Norton & Company.

MELLO, L. (1999). Quem tem medo da geopolítica? São Paulo: Hucitec/Edusp.

PANDA, J. (2022). Making ‘Quad Plus’ a reality. The Diplomat. Disponível em: <https://thediplomat.com/2022/01/making-quad-plus-a-reality/>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

PIRES, M.C.; MATTOS, T.C.L. (2016) Reflexões sobre a disputa por hegemonia entre Estados Unidos e China na perspectiva do capitalismo histórico. Monções: Revista de Relações Internacionais da UFGD, v. 5, 54-90.

PIRES, M.C.; NASCIMENTO, L.G. (2020). The Monroe Doctrine 2.0 and US-China-Latin America Trilateral Relations. International Organisations Research Journal (IORJ), v.15, n.3.

DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2020-03-08

PRIME MINISTER OF AUSTRALIA (2021). Joint leaders statement on AUKUS. Disponível em: <https://web.archive.org/web/20210927191438/https://www.pm.gov.au/media/joint-leaders-statement-aukus>. Acesso em: 25/01/2023.

SARKAR, A. (2021). Aukus: Indonesia urges China and Australia not to embark on new Asia-Pacific ‘arms race’ after nuclear deal. Independent. Disponível em: <https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/aukus-nuclear-submarine-china-australia-b1921992.html>. Acesso em: 25/01/2023.

SERBIN, A. (2019). Eurasia y América Latina en un mundo multipolar. Barcelona: Icaria, 2019.

TELLIS, A. (2020). Hustling in the Himalayas: The Sino-Indian Border Confrontation. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Disponível em: <https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Tellis_Himalayan-Border-Standoffs.pdf.>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

THE WHITE HOUSE (2021). Quad Leaders’ Joint Statement: “The Spirit of the Quad”. The White House Briefing Room. Disponível em: <https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/12/quad-leaders-joint-statement-the-spirit-of-the-quad/.>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

TIMES OF INDIA (TOI) (2020). US, European officials mulling to create ‘Asian NATO’ to contain China’s expansionist ambitions. ANI, TOI. Disponível em: <https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/us-european-officials-mulling-to-create-asian-nato-to-contain-chinas-expansionist-ambitions/articleshow/78429090.cms>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

TRADING ECONOMICS (2022). Exports by Country. Trading Economics. Disponível em: <https://tradingeconomics.com/japan/exports-by-country>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

UNITED NATIONS COMTRADE (2022). UN Comtrade Database. United Nations. Disponível em: <https://comtrade.un.org/default.htm?aspxerrorpath=/pb/Default.aspx>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

WHITE PAPER (2017). China’s Policies on Asia-Pacific Security Cooperation. The State Council, The People’s Republic of China. Disponível em: <http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2017/01/11/content_281475539078636.htm>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

______________ (2019). China’s Position on the China-US Economic and Trade Consultations. The State Council, The People’s Republic of China. Disponível em: <http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2019/06/02/content_281476694892692.htm>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

______________(2018). The Facts and China’s Position on China-US Trade Friction. The State Council, The People’s Republic of China. Disponível em: <http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2018/09/26/content_281476319220196.htm>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

WILLSHER, K. (2021). Aukus: France’s ambassador recall is ‘tip of the iceberg’, say analysts. The Guardian. Disponível em; <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/18/aukus-france-ambassador-recall-is-tip-of-the-iceberg-say-analysts>. Acesso em: 25/01/2023.

WONG, C. (2020) 15 Asian nations sign RCEP, world’s biggest free-trade deal, after eight years. South China Morning Post.

Disponível em: <https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3109939/china-declares-victory-15-asian-nations-sign-worlds-biggest>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

ZHOU, L. (2020). What is RCEP and what does an Indo-Pacific free-trade deal offer China? South China Morning Post.

Disponível em: <https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3109436/what-rcep-and-what-does-indo-pacific-free-trade-deal-offer>. Acesso em: 05/08/2022.

Downloads

Publicado

2023-07-05

Edição

Seção

Artigos