RESSURGIMENTO DA VISÃO MUNDIAL CHINESA? UMA ANÁLISE CONCEITUAL DA REINCORPORAÇÃO DAS PERSPECTIVAS BASEADAS HISTORICAMENTE NO PENSAMENTO INTERNACIONAL CHINÊS CONTEMPORÂNEO
Palavras-chave:
China, Teoria das Relações Internacionais, Tianxia, Confucionismo, RelacionalidadeResumo
O artigo aborda a re-emergência de visões do mundo enraizadas na China Imperial, dentro de debates chineses contemporâneos de relações internacionais. Um foco conceitual é aplicado para
examinar como visões do mundo, entendidas como percepções históricas sobre "o mundo" "ordem mundial" e o posicionamento global da China, têm se tornado parte central do pensamento
internacional chinês autóctone. Uma revisão inicial sobre as perspectivas globais embutidas na ordem leste asiática Sino-cêntrica, o sistema tributário, e filosofia Confuciana tradicional é seguida por uma análise da sua re-materialização dentro de debates relacionados à hierarquia regional, o conceito Tianxia (Tudo Sob o Céu), e a construção de uma teoria de RI com características chinesas. O artigo conclui enfatizando a importância de adotar uma abordagem de mente aberta para as teorizações internacionais incipientes chinesas. Devido a percepções divergentes sobre o propósito essencial de teoria, algumas recentes contribuições chinesas podem aparecer inconsistentes ou, de certo modo, difusas, vistas a partir do pensamento convencional de RI, no entanto, podem prover uma plataforma conceitual importante para inovação futura dentro da área.
Referências
ACHARYA, Amitav (2003). Will Asia’s Past Be Its Future?. International Security, 28 (3):
-64.
ACHARYA, Amitav; BUZAN, Barry (2010). Why is there no non-Western international
relations theory? In ACHARYA, Amitav. & BUZAN, Barry (ed.). Non-Western
International Relations Theory Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Oxon: Routledge, 1-26.
ANDORNINO, Giovanni (2006). The Nature and Linkages of China’s Tributary System
under the Ming and Qing Dynasties. Working Papers of the Global Economic History
Network (GEHN) No. 21/06. Department of Economic History, London School of
Economics.
BULL, H. (2002). A Sociedade Anárquica. São Paulo: IPRI.
CALLAHAN, William, A. (2008). Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a
New Hegemony? International Studies Review, 10: 749–61.
CERVO, Amado. L. (2008). Conceitos em Relações Internacionais. Revista Brasileira de
Política Internacional. 51 (2): 8-25.
CHENG, Zhimin; CHANG, Lulu (2013). The Power Strategy of Chinese Foreign Policy;
bringing Theoretical and Comparative Studies Together. NFG working paper no.03,
publicado em [http://fudan-uc.ucsd.edu/_files/chinawatch/201402_China_Watch_Power_Strategy_Chinese_FP.pdf]. Disponibilidade:
/09/2015.
FAIRBANK, John, K.;TÊNG, Ssu, Y. (1941). On The Ch'ing Tributary System. Harvard
Journal of Asiatic Studies, 6 (2): 135-246.
HAIBIN, Niu (2013). A grande estratégia Chinesa e os BRICS. CONTEXTO
INTERNACIONAL Rio de Janeiro, 35 (1): 197-229.
JIANG, An (2013). Mao Zedong’s “Three Worlds” Theory: Political Considerations and
Value for the Times. Social Sciences in China, 34 (1): 35-57.
KANG, David. C. (2003). Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks.
International Security, 27 (4): 57–85.
KIRBY, William. C. (1998). Traditions of Centrality, Authority, and Management in Modern
China´s Foreign Relations. In ROBINSON; Thomas & SHAMBAUGH, David (ed.). Chinese
Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 14-31.
LIQUN, Zhu (2010). China´s Foreign Policy Debates. Chaillot Papers, European Union
Institute for Security Studies, publicado em [http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/cp121-
China_s_Foreign_Policy_Debates.pdf]. Disponibilidade: 25/09/2015.
NOESSELT, Nele (2012). Is There a “Chinese School” of IR? GIGA Research Programme:
Power, Norms and Governance in International Relations. German Institute of Global and
Area Studies. Working papers no. 188. Publicado em
[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2134863]. Disponibilidade: 25/09/2015.
PINTO, Paulo Antônio, P. (2000). A China e o Sudeste Asiático. Porto Alegre: UFGRS.
QIN, Yaqing (2010). Why is there no Chinese international relations theory? In ACHARYA,
Amitav. & BUZAN, Barry. Non Western international relations theory; perspectives on
and beyond Asia.. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 25-50.
______. (2011). Qin Yaqing on Rules vs Relations, Drinking Coffee and Tea, and a
Chinese Approach to Global Governance, publicado em [http://www.theory-talks.org/]
Disponibilidade: 27/9 2015.
______. (2012). Culture and global thought: Chinese international theory in the making,
Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals 100: 67-89.
RINGMAR, Erik (2012). Performing International Systems: Two East- Asian Alternatives to
the Westphalian Order. International Organization, 66 (1): 1-25.
SARAIVA, José Flávio, S. (2009). Introduction: Alternative Views to International Relations
for the Beginning of the 21st Century. In SARAIVA José Flávio (ed.) Concepts, Histories
and Theories of International Relations for the 21st Century: National and Regional
Approaches. Brasília: IBRI.
SINEDINO, Giorgio (2011). Confúcio: Os Analectos. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.
SOLOMON, Richard. H. (1995). Chinese Political Negotiation Behavior, 1967-1984. Santa
Monica: RAND.
TICKNER, Arlene B. (2013). Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations,
European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 627– 46.
VISENTINI, Paulo F. (2012). As relações diplomáticas da Ásia: Articulações regionais e
afirmações mundiais (uma perspectiva brasileira). Belo Horizonte: Fino Traço.
WAEVER, Ole (1998). The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and
European Developments in Internationa] Relations. International Organization 52 (4): 687-
WANG, Mingming (2012). All under heaven (tianxia): Cosmological perspectives and
political ontologies in pre-modern China, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (1):
–83.
WANG, Yuan, K. (2013). Explaining the tributary system, power, confucianism and war in
medieval Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies 13: 207–32.
WATSON, Adam (1992). The Evolution of International Society. London: Routledge.
WIGHT, Martin (2002). A Política do Poder. São Paulo: IPRI.
XINNING, Song (2001). Building International Relations Theory with Chinese
Characteristics. Journal of Contemporary China, 10 (26): 61–74.
XIAOYU, Pu (2012). Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the
Diffusion of International Norms. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 5: 341–
XU, Bijun (2014). Is Zhao´s Tianxia system misunderstood? Tshingua China Law Review,
(95): 95-108.
XUETONG, Yan (2001). The rise of China in Chinese eyes. Journal of Contemporary
China, 10 (26): 33–9.
______. (2012). Yan Xuetong on Chinese Realism, the Tsinghua School of International
Relations, and the Impossibility of Harmony, publicado em [http://www.theory-talks.org/].
Disponibilidade: 25/09/ 2015.
YEOPHANTONG, Pichamon (2013). Governing the World: China’s Evolving Conceptions
of Responsibility. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 6: 329–64.
YUXIN, Jia; BENQING, Sun (2002). Contrastive Study of the Ancient Chinese and Western
Linguistic Worldview. Intercultural Communication Studies XI (3): 55-66.
ZEWEI, Yang (2011). Western International Law and China’s Confucianism in the 19th
Century: Collision and Integration. Journal of the History of International Law 13: 285–
ZHANG, F. (2014). How hierarchic was the historical East Asian system? International
Politics, 51 (1): 1–22.
ZHANG, Yongjin (2007). Politics, culture and scholarly responsibility in China: toward a
culturally sensitive analytical approach. Asian Perspective, 31 (3): 103-24.
ZHAO, Suisheng (2013). Chinese Foreign Policy as a Rising Power to find its Rightful Place.
PERCEPTIONS, XVIII (1): 101-128.
ZHAO, Tingyang (2006). Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under-Heaven’.
Social Identities, 12 (1): 29-41.
