COMPREENDENDO A RACIONALIZAÇÃO TÉCNICA DAS RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS: UMA PERSPECTIVA CRÍTICA A PARTIR DAS FONTES DO DIREITO INTERNACIONAL
Palavras-chave:
Direito internacional e relações internacionais., Fontes, Formalização do sistema internacionalResumo
No contexto do intrincado debate interdisciplinar que se coloca entre as Relações Internacionais e o Direito Internacional, o presente artigo explora a progressiva construção das fontes atualmente em vigor no direito internacional e as circunstâncias políticas de suas mutações ao longo da prática histórica dos Estados.
Dessa forma, examina-se em que medida essas fontes contribuíram e tiveram êxito nos esforços de gradual formalização técnica das relações internacionais.
Referências
AKEHURST, Michael (1975). Custom as a Source of International Law. British Yearbook of
International Law, 47(1): 1-53.
BAKER, Roozbeh R. B. (2010). Customary International Law in the 21st Century: Old Challenges
and New Debates. European Journal of International Law, 21(1): 173-204.
BRÖLMANN, Catherine (2005). Law-Making Treaties: Form and Function in International Law.
Nordic Journal of International Law, 74(3/4): 383-404.
BYERS, Michael (1999). Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and
Customary Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
______. (2008). International Law. In REUS-SMIT Christian & SNIDAL, Duncan (eds.). The
Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 612-634.
CARR, Edward H. (1940). The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study
of International Relations. London: Macmillan and Co.
ACCIOLY, Hildebrando; CASELLA, Paulo B.; NASCIMENTO E SILVA, G.E. (2011). Manual
de Direito Internacional Público, 19ª ed.. São Paulo: Saraiva.
CRAWFORD, James (2012). Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
D’AMATO, Anthony (1971). The Concept of Custom in International Law. Ithaca: Cornell
University Press.
DEKKER, I. F.; MEIJERS, H.; POST, H. G. (2003). On the Foundations and Sources of
International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DE VISSCHER, Charles (1968). Theory and Reality in Public International Law. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
DINH, Nguyen Quoc; DAILLIER, Patrick; PELLET, Alain (1999). Droit International Public.
Paris: LGDJ.
FERRAZ JUNIOR, Tércio Sampaio (2003). Introdução ao Estudo do Direito: Técnica, Decisão,
Dominação, 4. ed.. São Paulo: Atlas.
FITZMAURICE, Gerald (1956). The Foundations of the Authority of International Law and the
Problem of Enforcement. The Modern Law Review, 19(1): 1-13.
______. (1957). The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of
the Rule of Law. Recueil des Cours, 92: 1-227.
FITZMAURICE, Malgosia (2015). Treaties. In WOLFRUM, Rüdiger (ed.). Max Planck
Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
FRIEDRICH, Jürgen (2013). International Environmental Soft Law: the Functions and Limits of
Nonbinding Instruments in International Environmental Governance and Law. New York: Springer.
GROTIUS, Hugo (2004). O Direito da Guerra e da Paz. Florianópolis: Editora Unijuí .
GUILLAUME, Gilbert (2011). The Use of Precedent by International Judges and Arbitrators.
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(1): 5-23.
GUZMAN, Andrew T. & MEYER, Timothy L. (2010). International Soft Law. Journal of Legal
Analysis, 2(1): 171-225.
HERZ, Mônica (1997). Teoria das Relações Internacionais no Pós-Guerra Fria. Dados, 40(2).
KELSEN, Hans (1966). Principles of International Law. 2
nd ed.. New York: Holt, Rinchart and
Winston.
KEOHANE, Robert (1993). International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International
Relations Theory. Boulder: Colorado Westview Press.
______. (1998). International Relations, Old and New. In GOODIN, Robert & KLINGEMANN,
Hans-Dieter (eds.). A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KEOHANE, Robert & NYE, Joseph (2012). Power and Interdependence, 2nd ed.. Boston:
Longman.
LAUTERPACHT, H. (2012). The Function of Law in the International Community. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
MCNAIR, Arnold Duncan (1961). The Law of Treaties. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
MELLO, Celso de Albuquerque (2007). Curso de Direito Internacional Público. 15.ed.. Rio de
Janeiro: Renovar.
MEARSHEIMER, John J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W.
Norton.
MORGENTHAU, Hans (2005). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 7
th
ed.. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
ÖBERG, M. D.(2006). The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the UN Security Council and General
Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ. The European Journal of International Law, 16 (5):
-906.
OPPENHEIM, Lassa (1955). International Law: A Treatise. 8th ed.. London: Longmans.
PUFENDORF, Samuel (1991). On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
REZEK, Francisco (2012). Direito Internacional Público. 13. ed.. São Paulo: Saraiva.
SANDS, Philipp (2003). Principles of International Environmental Law, 6
th ed.. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
SHAHABUDDEEN, Mohammed (1996). Precedent in the World Court. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
SCHWARZENBERGER, Georg (1971). A Manual of International Law, 5
th ed.. London:
Stevens & Sons.
SHAPCOTT, Richard (2008). Critical Theory. In REUS-SMIT, Christian & SNIDAL, Duncan
(eds). The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 327-
SHAW, Malcolm (2014). International Law, 7
th ed.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SEITENFUS, Ricardo (2003). Manual das Organizações Internacionais. Porto Alegre: Livraria
do Advogado.
SOARES, Guido Fernando Silva (2003). A Proteção Internacional do Meio Ambiente. Barueri:
Manole.
TANG, Yi Shin (2009). The International Trade Policy for Technology Transfers: Legal and
Economic Dilemmas on Multilateralism versus Bilateralism. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law
International.
THIRLWAY, Hugh (2014). The International Court of Justice. In EVANS, Malcolm D (ed.)
International Law Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WALTZ, Kenneth (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
ICJ Case Law
Application of Genocide Convention (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), [2007]
ICJ 191.
Arrest Warrant (Congo v. Belgium), [2002] ICJ 1.
Asylum (Colombia v. Peru), [1950] ICJ 6.
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company Ltd. (Belgium v. Spain), [1970] ICJ 1.
Chórzow Factory (Germany v. Poland), [1928] PCIJ (ser. A) No. 17.
Continental Shelf (Libya v. Malta), [1985] ICJ 13.
Construction of a Wall (Advisory Opinion), [2004] ICJ 136.
Corfu Channel (United Kingdom v. Albania), [1949] ICJ 4.
East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), [1995] ICJ 90.
Fisheries (United Kingdom v. Norway), [1951] ICJ 3.
German Settlers in Poland, [1923] PCIJ (ser. B) No. 6.
Gulf of Maine (Canada v. United States), [1984] ICJ 165.
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion)¸ [1996] ICJ 226.
Lotus (France v. Turkey), [1927] PCIJ (ser. A) No. 10.
Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), [1986] ICJ 1.
North Sea Continental Shelf cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands) [1969] ICJ 1.
Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France), [1974] ICJ 253.
Right of Passage over Indian Territory (Portugal v. India), [1960] ICJ 6.
Temple of Preah Vihear (Merits), [1962] ICJ 6.
