Sobre a ilegalidade das leis de anistias para crimes graves
Palavras-chave:
aut dedere aut judicare, Justiça de transição, Leis de anistia, jurisprudência internacionalResumo
A proposta do presente artigo é discutir a legalidade de leis de anistia face à obrigação dos Estados de punir ou extraditar responsáveis por casos de graves crimes internacionais. Em outras palavras, o objetivo do mesmo é responder à questão: “Qual a legalidade das leis de anistia perante o direito internacional em casos de crimes de jus cogens?” Para tanto, o artigo avalia primeiramente o reconhecimento do principio aut dedere aut judicare (perseguir ou extraditar) como obrigação internacional, levando em consideração o direito positivado em tratados internacionais, o direito consuetudinário e a doutrina. Posteriormente, ele discute a legalidade de leis domésticas de anistia à luz de tal princípio por meio da análise de dispositivos legais internacionais supostamente permissivos e de casos jurisprudenciais.
Referências
AKANDE, Dapo. (2004). International Law Immunities and the International Criminal Court. The American Journal of International Law, vol. 98, n. 3, pp. 407-33.
BANTEKAS, I; NASH, S. (2007). International Criminal Law – Third Edition. Routledge- Cavendish, United Kingdom. Cap. 4, pp. 71-112.
BASSIOUNI, M. (1995). Aut Dedere Aut Judicare: The Duty to Extradite or Prosecute in International Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Dordrecht.
BASSIOUNI, M. (2003). Introduction to International Criminal Law.
Hotei Publishing. BASSIOUNI, M.(1996). Searching for Peace and Achieving Justice: The Need for Accountability. Law and Contemporary Problems, Autumn, vol. 59, n. 4, Accountability for International Crimes and Serious Violations of Fundamental Human Rights. pp. 9-28.
BELLAMY, A.; Williams, P.; Griffin, S. (2004). Understanding peacekeeping. Cambridge,
UK, Polity Press.
BORAINE, A. L. (2006). Transitional Justice: A Holistic Interpretation. Journal of
International Affairs, Fall, vol. 60, I. pp. 17-27.
BYERS, M. (1999). Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and
Customary International Law. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, Reino Unido.
CALL, C. T. (2004). Is Transitional Justice Really Just? Brown Journal of World Affairs,
Summer/Fall, vol. XI, I. pp. 101-13.
CANÇADO TRINDADE, A. A. (1998). O fim das “leis” de auto-anistia. Correio Braziliense,
de dezembro 2008. Disponível em: <
http://www.desaparecidospoliticos.org.br/pagina.php?id=193>. Acesso: 01 de junho 2010.
CASSESE, A. (2003). International Criminal Law. Oxford University Press, New York, pp.
–2.
CAVALLARO, J; Brewer, S. (2008). Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the
Twenty-First Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court. The American Journal of
International Law, vol. 102, n. 4. pp. 768-827.
CHESTERMAN, S. (2001). ‘No Justice Without Peace? International Criminal Law and the
Decision to Prosecute. In: Chesterman, S. (ed), Civillians in War. Boulder, CO: Lynne
Rienner, pp. 145-63.
CICV. Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in
Armed Forces in the Field (1949). Disponível em:
CICV. Protocolo Adicional às Convenções de Genebra relativo à Proteção das Vítimas de
Conflitos Armados sem Caráter Internacional (Protocolo II) (1977). Disponível em: <
http://www2.mre.gov.br/dai/protocolo%20II.htm>. Acesso: 11 de maio 2010.
DOYLE, M.; SAMBANIS, N. (2000). International Peacebuilding: A Theoretical and
Quantitative Analysis. American Political Science Review, vol. 94, n.4, pp. 779-801.
ÐUKIC, D. (2007). Transitional justice and the International Criminal Court – in ‘‘the interests
of justice’’?. International Review of the Red Cross, vol. 89, n. 867. pp. 691-718.
EISIKOVITS, N. (2005). Sympathizing with the enemy: a theory of political reconciliation. Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of
Philosophy in the College of Management Law School, Tel Aviv.
GAVRON, J. (2002). Amnesties in the Light of Developments in International Law and the
Establishment of the International Criminal Court. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 51, n. 1, pp. 91-117.
GOODHAND, J.; HULME, D. (1999). From Wars to Complex Political Emergencies: Understanding Conflict and peace-building in the new world order. Third World Quarterly, vol. 20, n. 1, pp. 13-26.
HAZAN, P. (2006). Measuring the impact of punishment and forgiveness: a framework for evaluating transitional justice. International Review of the Red Cross. vol. 88, n. 861. pp. 19-47.
HUNTINGTON, S. (1993). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press.
IDE, D. (2009). O mandado de prisão do TPI contra al-Bashir à luz da relação entre poder e moral internacionais. Meridiano 47, n. 105, Abril, pp. 30-3.
KOLB, R. (2001). Théorie du ius cogens international – Essai de relecture du concept. Publications de l’Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales, Genebra. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
KRAUSE, K.; Jütersonke, O. (2005). Peace, Security, and Development in Post-Conflict Environments. Security Dialogue, vol. 36, n. 4, pp. 447-62.
LAMBOURNE, W. (2004). Post-Conflict Peacebuilding: Meeting Human Needs for Justice and Reconciliation. Peace, Conflict and Development, 4, April. pp. 1-24.
LANDSMAN, S. (1996). Alternative Responses to Serious Human Rights Abuses: Of Prosecution and Truth Commissions. Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 59, n. 4 Accountability for International Crimes and Serious Violations of Fundamental Human Rights. pp. 81-92.
LEEBAW, B. A. (2008). The Irreconcilable Goals of Transitional Justice. Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 30. pp. 95-118.
MCCALPIN, J. O. (2002). Justice under Constraints: The Nature of Transitional Justice in Deeply Divided Societies. Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Sciences at Brown University. Provence, Rhode Island.
MENDELOFF, D. (2004). Truth-Seeking, Truth-Telling, and Postconflict Peacebuilding: Curb the Enthusiasm? International Studies Review, vol. 6. pp. 355-80.
MERON, T. (1995).International Criminalization of Internal Atrocities. The American Journal of International Law, vol. 89, n. 3, pp. 554-77.
MEZAROBBA, G. (2008). O que é justiça de transição? Uma análise a partir do caso brasileiro. Trabalho apresentado no 6o Encontro da Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política, Campinas, SP.
MORRIS, M. (1996). International Guidelines against Impunity: Facilitating Accountability. Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 59, n. 4, pp. 29-39.
NÍ AOLÁIN, F. (2008). Expanding the Boundaries of Transitional Justice. Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 22, n. 2. pp. 213-22.
OEA. Convenção Americana de Direitos Humanos (1969).
OLSON, L. M. (2006). Provoking the Dragon on the Patio – Matters of Transitional Justice: Penal Repression vs. Amnesties. International Review of the Red Cross, vol. 88, n. 862, pp.
-94.
ONU. Convenção Contra a Tortura e Outros Tratamentos ou Penas Crueis, Desumanos ou
Degradantes (1984). Disponível em: <http://www.onu-brasil.org.br/doc_penas.php>. Acesso: 12 de junho 2010.
ONU. Convenção de Viena sobre o Direito dos Tratados (1969). Disponível em: <http://www2.mre.gov.br/dai/dtrat.htm>. Acesso: 15 abril de 2010.
ONU. Convenção Internacional para a Supressão e Repressão do Crime de Apartheid (1973). Disponível em: <http://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201015/volume-1015-I-14861- English.pdf>. Acesso: 10 de junho 2010.
ONU. Convenção para A Prevenção e Repressão do Crime de Genocídio (1948). Disponível em: <http://www2.mre.gov.br/dai/genocidio.htm>. Acesso: 11 maio 2010.
ONU. Corte Internacional de Justiça (2000). Affaire relative au mandat d'arrêt du 11 Avril 2000 (République Democratique du Congo c. Belgique). Disponível em: <http://www.icj- cij.org/docket/files/121/8126.pdf>. Acesso: 15 de junho 2010.
ONU. Estatuto do Tribunal Penal Internacional (1998). Disponível em: <http://www.cedin.com.br/site/pdf/legislacao/pdf_tratados6/Estatuto%20do%20Tribunal%20 Penal%20Internacional.pdf>. Acesso: 15 de junho 2010.
ORENTLICHER, D. F. (1991). Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime. The Yale Law Journal, vol. 100, n. 8, Symposium: International Law. pp. 2537-615.
POSNER, E. A.; VERMEULE, A. (2004). Transitional Justice as Ordinary Justice. Harvard Law Review, vol. 117, n. 3. pp. 762-825.
RATNER, S.; ABRAMS, J. S. (2001). Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy. Oxford University Press, Ed. 2.
ROHT-ARRIAZA, N. (1990). State Responsibility to Investigate and Prosecute Grave Human Rights Violations in International Law. California Law Review, vol. 78, n. 2, pp. 448-513. ROHT-ARRIAZA, N. (ed.) (1995). Impunity and Human Rights in International Law and
Practice. Oxford University Press.
ROHT-ARRIAZA, N.; Gibson, L. (1998). The Developing Jurisprudence on Amnesty. Human
Rights Quarterly, vol. 20, n. 4, pp. 843-85.
SADAT, L. (2005). Exile, Amnesty and International Law. Faculty Working Paper Series,
Paper n. 05-04-03. pp. 1-67.
SCHARF, M. (1996). The Letter of the Law: The Scope of the International Legal Obligation to
Prosecute Human Rights Crimes. Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 59, n. 4 Accountability for International Crimes and Serious Violations of Fundamental Human Rights. pp. 41-61.
SIEFF, M; Wright, L. V. (1999). Reconciling Order and Justice? New Institutional Solutions in Post-Conflict States. Journal of International Affairs, Spring, vol. 52, n. 2. pp. 757-79.
SIKKINK, K.; WALLING, C. (2007). The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, vol. 44, n. 4. pp. 427-45.
SOOKA, A. (2006). Dealing with the Past and Transitional Justice: Building Peace Through Accountability. International Review of the Red Cross, vol. 88, n. 862, pp. 311-25.
SRIRAM, C. (2006). Exercising Universal Jurisdiction: Contemporary Disparate Practice. The International Journal of Human Rights, vol. 6, n. 4, pp. 49-76.
STAHN, C. (2001). Accomodating Individual Criminal Responsibility and National Reconciliation: The UN Truth Commission for East Timor. The American Journal of International Law ̧ vol. 95, n. 4, pp. 952-66.
SUNDFELD, C. A. (1992). Fundamentos de Direito Público. São Paulo, Malheiros Editores.
TEITEL, R. G. (2003). Transitional Justice Genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Law, vol. 16. pp. 69-84.
TSCHIRGI, N. (2004). Post-Conflict Peacebuilding Revisited: Achievements, Limitations, Challenges. Paper prepared for the WSP International/IPA Peacebuilding Forum Conference, New York. pp. 1-19.
UE. Convenção para a Proteção de Direitos Humanos e Liberdades Fundamentais (Convenção Européia de Direitos Humanos) (1950). Disponível em:
WALD, P. (2006). International Criminal Courts: Some Kudos and Concerns. Proceeding of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 150, n. 2, pp. 241-60.
WALTZ, K. (1954). Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
WIRTH, S. (2002). Immunity for Core Crimes: The ICJ’s Judgment in the Congo v. Belgium. European Journal of International Law, vol. 13, n. 4, pp. 877-93.
