DEONTOLOGIA E PROCEDIMENTALISMO:

UM DIÁLOGO ENTRE KANT E RAWLS

Authors

  • Evandro Barbosa Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brasil
  • Thais Cristina Alves Costa Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brasil

Keywords:

Proceduralism, Deontology, Autonomy, Kant, Rawls

Abstract

The text addresses the issue of justice, exploring the debate between procedural and substantive models of moral and political justification. It is argued that Rawls proposes a procedural interpretation of Kantian autonomy, prioritizing justice over the good. Michael Sandel’s critique is used to highlight a weakened deontological model that avoids transcendental foundations, relying instead on rational and publicly recognizable criteria. The objective is to demonstrate how proceduralism can bridge deontological principles with communal ethos, establishing a connection between Kantian and Rawlsian philosophies.

Author Biographies

Evandro Barbosa, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brasil

Professor nos Programas de Graduação e Pós-Graduação em Filosofia da Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPel. Coordenador do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia - UFPel. Foi Visiting Scholar (2019-2020) na University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, sob orientação do Prof. Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, com bolsa CAPES (Professor Visitante no Exterior Júnior). Ex-coordenador do Curso de Licenciatura em Filosofia Ead - UFPel (2019).

Thais Cristina Alves Costa, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brasil

Thaís Alves Costa is conducting postdoctoral research in Law at the Community University of the Chapecó Region, supported by a Fapesc scholarship, and is a Professor of Philosophy at the Federal University de Pelotas. She is currently a member and Young Scholar of the International Adam Smith Society (IASS). She served as a Visiting Scholar at the University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill from 2019 to 2023.

References

GOODMAN, Nelson. Fact, fiction and forecast. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1955.

HABERMAS, Jurgen; RAWLS, John. Debate sobre el liberalismo político. Trad. Gerard Vliar Roca. Barcelona: Paidós, 1998.

HABERMAS, Jurgen. Theorie der Kommunikatives Handelns. 2 Banden, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1981.

____________. Moralbewusstsein und Kommunikatives handeln. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1984.

____________. Faktizitat und Geltung: Beitrage zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des Demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1992.

____________. Die Postnational Konstellation: Politische Essays. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1998.

____________. “Reconciliation through the public use of reason: remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism”: 109- 131. In: The Journal of Philosophy (Vol. XCII, No 3, March 1995.

HONNETH, A. “A textura da justiça: sobre os limites do procedimentalismo contemporâneo” (trad. A. Sobottka e J. Ripoll). In: Civitas. Porto Alegre, vol. 09, nº 03, set-dez 2009, pp. 345-368.

KANT, Immanuel. Doutrina do Direito. (trad. Edson Bini) São Paulo: Ícone, 1994.

____________. “Em torno al tópico: talvez eso sea correcto em teoria, pero no sirve para la prática (1793)” (trad. M. F. Lopes e R. Aramayo). In: Teoria e Prática (org. J. M. Palácios, M. Lopez e R. Aramayo), Madrid: Tecnos, 1986, pp. 01- 60.

____________. Fundamentação da metafísica dos costumes. (trad. P. Quintela). Lisboa: Edições 70, 1992.

____________. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Erlagen: Fischer, 1984.

____________. La Metafísica de las Costumbres.(trad. Adela Cortina) 3ª ed. Madrid: Tecnos, 1999.

KORSGAARD, Christine M. “Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy”. In: Philosophy in America at the Turn of the Century: ‘Philosophy Documentation Center”, pp. 99-122.

OLIVEIRA, Nythamar Fernandes de.“Kant, Rawls e a fundamentação de uma teoria da justiça”. In: FELIPE, Sônia T. (org.), Justiça e Equidade. Florianópolis: Insular, 1998.

____________. “Moralidade, Eticidade e a fudamentação da ética”. In: Reflexão. PUCCAMP, nº 63, 1995.

PATON, H. J. The Categorical Imperative: ‘a study in Kant’s moral philosophy’. Chicago: Cambridge University Press, 1948.

RAWLS, John. A Theory Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.

____________. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. Paperback edition, 1996.

____________. The law of peoples. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.

____________. Collected papers, org. Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999.

____________. Lectures on the history of moral philosophy, org. Barbara herman. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2000.

____________. Justice as fairness: a restatement. Edited by Erin Kelly. Cambradge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.

____________. “Kantian constructivism in moral philosophy. Journal of philosophy 77 (1980): 515-572.

____________. “Reply to Habermas”: 132-180. In: The Journal of Philosophy (Vol. XCII, No 3, March 1995.

____________. “Themes in Kant’s moral philosophy. In: FORSTER, Eckart (Ed.) Kant’s transcendental deductions: the three critiques and the opus postumum. Stanford University Press, 1989.

SANDEL, M. El liberalismo y los limites de la justicia. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2000.

SCHWARTZ, Adina. “Moral neutrality and primary goods”. In: Ethics 83, (1973), p. 294-307.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

Barbosa, E., & Costa, T. C. A. (2024). DEONTOLOGIA E PROCEDIMENTALISMO:: UM DIÁLOGO ENTRE KANT E RAWLS. REVISTA INSTANTE, 6(3), 67–92. Retrieved from https://revista.uepb.edu.br/revistainstante/article/view/4088

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): DOSSIÊ: KANT E A FILOSOFIA PRÁTICA

Section

Artigos